Ando a ler um excelente livro que vou ter de comentar aqui no blogue, “The Art of Action: Leadership that Closes the Gaps between Plans, Actions and Results” de Stephen Bungay.
Para já, fico-me por uma citação relacionada com o tema da estratégia e da sua relação com as partes interessadas. Fez-me lembrar a minha experiência de trabalhar com empresas que elegem o influenciador ou o prescritor como o verdadeiro motor do modelo de negócio. Recordar:
- A mensagem de quem sabe quem são os seus alvos (Setembro de 2016)
- Arquitecto de paisagens competitivas (parte I) e (parte II) (Junho de 2012)
- Dores de crescimento (Junho de 2011)
- Sem uma estratégia clara, come on... BSC? (parte I) e (parte II) (Julho de 2014)
- Balanced Scorecard (parte V) (Agosto de 2016)
“A few years ago, I visited a manufacturer of domestic boilers. At the time, the company was number three in the market and was not only making good returns but gaining share, closing the gap with the number two player. I asked all the top executives why the company was so successful. One said it was the quality of the product – but he admitted that the differences with competitors’ products were small. One said it was the brand – but had to admit that the market leader’s brand was also very strong. So it went on: R&D, technology, production efficiency, delivery times, customer service – all had their advocates, but none in itself felt compelling.E na sua empresa, como aborda o ecossistema da procura? Está a ver onde a estória das partes interessadas na ISO 9001 nos pode levar?
.
My last interview was with the managing director. I asked him once again why the business was so successful. “Let me tell you how our business works,” he said. “Almost all of our domestic business is for replacement of existing boilers. People replace boilers when their existing ones break down. What do you do when your boiler breaks down? You call the installer,” he continued, answering his own question. “When he tells you the boiler is too old to repair because he can’t get the parts, what do you do?” He paused. “I’ll tell you. You do what he suggests. And when you ask him which new boiler to install, he tells you that too. So 90 percent of all purchasing decisions are made by the installer.” He paused to let this sink in. “Our business,” he said deliberately, “is about service to the installer. But I am the only person around here who gets that. They all think I’m an old man with a bee in his bonnet.” He looked me in the eye. “We are being successful because we offer our installers better service than any of our competitors.
...
This informed all his operational decisions. He wanted to increase the number of visits installers paid to the company’s site – which was already more than any of their rivals – and build a new training center. He was obsessed with the quality of “its installation literature. He was ready to invest whatever it took to increase spare parts availability at the distributors so that installers did not waste time waiting for a part. He wanted the new range of boilers the company was just developing to be energy efficient, quiet, and reliable, but above all he wanted them to be easy to install. And so on. And it was working.
.
He wanted to run some strategy workshops to focus all his top team on optimizing service to the installer. They were already making their implicit strategy happen, but as it became explicit and the top team grew more aligned, so decision making and execution became more focused. At the time of writing the company has overtaken the number two player, and is closing the gap with the market leader.
.
In this example, service to the installer is the source of competitive advantage my friends are seeking to exploit. Their aim is to achieve leadership of their chosen segments. They have identified becoming the supplier of choice to the installer as an opportunity across the market, and by excelling at that they are unhinging the position of their major competitors. They already have the capabilities to do so, but they are investing further in those capabilities and creating others. They are doing what all successful strategists do, which is to build further on their existing strengths. They therefore have a coherent strategy”