🚨 Truly shameful that a leading Italian 🇮🇹luxury brand like “Loro Piana” (LVMH Group) known for its sky-high prices and celebrity clientele, has resorted to such horrible labor exploitation and miserable working conditions, all to make massive profits! pic.twitter.com/4lzRrvF3f0
— Mambo Italiano (@mamboitaliano__) July 14, 2025
Entretanto, em "Opinion: The Big Luxury Simulation Is Over":
"Whereas luxury once meant beautifully crafted objects, it became about storytelling. Instead of luxury goods, brands retooled to deliver luxury narratives. And as long as their products signalled luxury, they realised they could cut corners on quality to boost margins and meet growing demand without alienating shoppers.
...
This strategy has proved stunningly successful, especially with people who grew up in a world of simulacra, conditioned to consume markers of goods more than the goods themselves. As Dana Thomas noted in "Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster" (2007), "Consumers don't buy luxury branded items for what they are, but for what they represent." On social media as in the street, what mattered were symbols of luxury.
But fast-forward to the present and it appears this logic has its limits.
...
Last year, when Dior was taken to task for the use of a sweatshop labour in its supply chain, Italian prosecutors alleged the brand paid little more than €50 euros a piece for bags which retailed for more than €2500 each. Now LVMH stablemate Loro Piana has been pulled up by the same probe. Such stories make the luxury industry look like a scam selling empty signifiers to suckers.
It's no surprise that sales of superfakes - low-cost, high-fidelity replicas mostly made in China and sold directly to customers via WhatsApp groups and social media - have rocketed, driven by a new attitude to counterfeits. Whereas owning a fake once came with a sense of shame, now it's seen as a savvy move. Why risk feeling stupid for buying subpar, overpriced goods, when you can game the system?"
Entretanto no WSJ do passado dia 14 de Julho, "'Superfake' Bags Take Sales From Real Thing":
"Counterfeiters have perfected the knockoff handbagand it is disrupting the economics of the luxury industry. Fake purses have always been around, but they were the cheap and plasticky kind that could be picked up for a few bucks from a sidewalk seller. A new generation of "superfakes," as they are known in the industry, look as good as the real thing and cost anywhere from $500 to $5,000. Counterfeiters take your order through encrypted services such as WhatsApp or Telegram, give real-time customer service and deliver the goods straight to your door in a branded box.
They pay social-media influencers to promote illicit goods directly to American and European consumers. The technique is proving so good at sanitizing counterfeiters' shady image that the language used to talk about the bags is changing. The word "fake" isn't used anymore. Instead, fans call the purses replicas, mirror bags, superclones or 1:1s ("one to ones").
In a red flag for luxury brands, young shoppers are embracing the superfakes."
O que emerge destes três textos é um retrato da crise de autenticidade da indústria do luxo, onde a promessa de excelência foi trocada por margens, storytelling e exploração laboral — e onde a resposta dos consumidores mais jovens não é a indignação moral, mas sim o pragmatismo: se é tudo fachada, então vale mais pagar pela ilusão bem feita.
A lição é clara: o luxo que corta na qualidade, na ética e na transparência está a criar o seu próprio coveiro. E esse coveiro é um público informado, desiludido e disposto a contornar o sistema.



