Trabalhar uma marca a sério.

Artesãos versus industrialistas.
Artesãos versus carcaças ocas.
Artesãos versus aristocratas arruinados.

"The danger — expressed most simply — is living by the quarter. If there’s one thing that leaps out from the work done by eatbigfish around challenger brands, it’s that these businesses knew building a brand takes time.
...
Unfortunately, short-termism is the business climate of our time. We live in the short-term. The danger is that because so few in the c-suites of major businesses these days have marketing experience they don’t understand that imposing short-term disciplines on marketing kills brands.
...
if you pursue efficiency solely you walk away from effectiveness, and we know this very well now. The most efficient way to use marketing and advertising is to achieve mediocre results at minute cost. That way you get immense returns on investments, but unfortunately you’ll do nothing in the long-term.
.
Long-term growth is reaching, not for low-hanging fruit, but the fruit at the top of the tree. It’s about bringing tomorrow’s consumers into your brand. If all you’re doing is going for the low-hanging fruit at the bottom of the funnel, you can kiss goodbye to that really profitable long-term growth."

Trechos retirados de "‘Challenger thinking is how brands drive growth’: Peter Field on 20 years of challenger brands"

"psychological ownership"

"psychological ownership. That’s when consumers feel so invested in a product that it becomes an extension of themselves.
.
Companies that encourage psychological ownership can entice customers to buy more products, at higher prices, and even to willingly promote those products among their friends. But if businesses disrespect this feeling, sales can suffer."

Em "How Customers Come to Think of a Product as an Extension of Themselves" um texto sobre como promover a "psychological ownership":

• "One way is to allow customers a hand in forming the product"
• "Businesses should strive to make products customizable. When consumers can personalize products, they buy more and are happy to recommend those products to friends."
• "Building intimate knowledge - This occurs when customers believe they know every facet of a product or brand so well that they have a special, unique relationship with it."

"Companies legally own their brand, but their most devoted customers may own it psychologically. Businesses should cultivate this feeling—and then respect it."

A evolução das marcas

"Now that change has become the new normal, brands have to evolve from the power of symbolism and the power of narration to the power of reciprocity. As brands morph from symbols and stories to systems, they need to find new ways to be relevant, useful, and entertaining. They need to create hospitable ecosystems and build upon ideas that welcome and nurture consumer relationships now and in the future."

Trecho retirado de "The Ways Customers Use Products Have Changed — but Brands Haven’t Kept Up"

Marcas: Hara-Kiri

"Overproduction is a huge problem that the industry tries to hide as it chases after fake numbers and reports of constant growth.
...
The industry talks about conspicuous consumption — buying for the sake of buying — as the reason behind the growth in the luxury segment. But brands are producing more product than there is demand for. I call it conspicuous production, producing for the sake of producing and artificially inflating the numbers.
...
Supply meets demand is the basic rule of business and one the whole industry seems to ignore. Sales are the first indicators of overproduction. The goal should be to reach 100 per cent sell-through before discounts, though figures over 90 per cent are acceptable, as no one can predict the exact demand down to each SKU [stock-keeping unit]. What’s shocking is that most brands in big stores don’t even sell 20 per cent of their merchandise before discount, yet continue to report wholesale growth.
.
Stores and brands are trying to hide the truth by opening outlet stores, which sell unsold merchandise and sometimes even similar collections that never went to the full-price retailers. Outlet stores then have the same problem: they end up with deadstock that they resell to other countries and the same scenario repeats itself. If nobody wanted something full-price, it doesn’t necessarily mean that anyone will want it half-price. Recent reports show that more than 30 per cent of merchandise produced by fashion brands will never be sold. The clothes end up in landfill. It affects consumer buying behaviour as well. Pieces bought on discount appear to be less valuable psychologically to the consumer, which makes it easier to throw them out.
...
Luxury is like dating. If something is available and in front of you, it’s less desirable. Scarcity is what defines it. One of the ways to create scarcity is to reduce the supply curve. The more demand there is, the more desire it creates. Desire is the key value in luxury business.
...
The parallel market is one of the dirtiest secrets of the fashion industry. [Moi ici: Outro tema de que me falaram na conversa na origem de "Em busca de um novo oásis"] More and more luxury stores have become a beautiful façade to cover the real business going on behind the scenes. In addition to selling a small part of the merchandise directly to the final consumer, they also play an intermediary role in reselling the biggest part of their order to horrible stores, often in remote locations all around the world, which cannot get brands through the official channels.
...
Brands are perfectly aware of the parallel market, and the stores involved in it, but are closing their eyes in order to further report growing sales numbers. Officially those brands are sold only in the best stores in the world, and claim a limited and exclusive distribution, but in reality their merchandise ends up in horrible places. There is a certain obsession with reporting the growth for fashion brands no matter what the true cost.
...
The values and goals have mutated so much that things that simply make sense start to look abnormal or disruptive. Historically, brands produced clothes to sell to a final consumer. Today brands produce runway collections to sell a perfume or a wallet in a duty-free store. They stuff stores with unwanted merchandise to report artificial growth. They keep overproducing while talking about sustainability. They claim exclusive distribution while paralleling their own merchandise. They are slowly killing their brands in the long term to have a quick profit today."

Interessante, relacionar a legenda das figuras do artigo de donde retirei estes trechos "Vetements: the gospel of Guram Gvasalia":

"they chose to shoot their designs on local people and families living in the area"

Com este outro artigo "QUORA: IS VICTORIA'S SECRET FAILING? IT'S NOT LOOKING GOOD":

"The first clear indication that it’s the perfection in Victoria’s Secret images that is proving to be a turnoff was the emergence of competitor Aerie, whose marketing plays up its “unretouched, real women” angle. Ever since it launched its no-airbrushing policy in 2014, Aerie’s sales have taken off.
...
As a policy, Curvy Kate does not use any professional models, sourcing the eclectic mix of women it features from social media.
.
Also going the real-women, no-Photoshopping route and winning reams of positive reviews is LONELY LINGERIE, which a few months ago placed a 56-year-old woman at the centre of their campaign."

Autenticidade versus "fake"

Destruir uma marca é tão fácil

"Desperate to replace the subscribers it was losing, Time ran blatantly promotional ads that were disconnected from the traditional image campaign it had under way - one that emphasized the heritage and quality of Time journalism and highlighted the brand’s personality. Thus the magazine unwittingly set up an experiment, and the results quickly flooded in. The promotional ads were so effective that Time soon killed off its brand campaign. A truly sad aspect of the case is that the editors had been working hard to create a better Time for a sped-up era. They knew they had one of the strongest brands for news in a world that had suddenly become news-obsessed. Their circulation-focused colleagues, by doubling down on the “call now” offers, not only failed to communicate that - they implicitly conveyed a lack of faith in the brand."

Trecho retirado de "Don’t Let Big Data Bury Your Brand".

Internet e autenticidade (parte II)

Já o escrevi por aqui, tantas e tantas vezes, no meu trabalho, muitas vezes, acabo sendo quem abre porta para o primeiro contacto das empresas com o marketing.
.
Se uma empresa aposta na subida na escala de valor, descobre que tem de fazer algo mais do que produzir e vender. Tem de criar uma marca, tem de a comunicar, tem de lhe transmitir uma densidade e uma identidade própria.
.
Ontem, enquanto escrevia "Internet e autenticidade" recordei-me de um empresário do calçado que em 2010, apesar de ter uma empresa saudável a ganhar dinheiro, acreditava que o calçado em Portugal não tinha futuro, por causa da China. Como ele trabalhava no segmento do private label para marcas estrangeiras, tentei desafiá-lo a recomeçar uma marca que tinha existido nos anos sessenta do século passado. Recusava sempre com o argumento de que montar uma campanha de marketing ficava muito caro.
.
Já depois de "Internet e autenticidade" vi que o Miguel Barbot no FB me tinha enviado uma hiperligação para "Tracksmith, stories and experiences". Mais um exemplo da aposta na experiência, da aposta na autenticidade e, também, da aposta na escassez.
.
O artigo começa por referir este texto "The future of luxury - Experience counts" onde se pode ler:

"tilting a bit from having to being"

Onde se reforça o papel crescente da importância da experiência, Recordar "Experiência versus preço".
.
Depois, o texto começa a descrever como uma marca, sem loja física, está a criar a sua aura, está a desenhar a sua proposta de valor:

"With no physical stores yet, and a small collection of niche products, it is using story to create an experience for its customers – the story of running, style, culture and history.
...
Tracksmith is testing the market and tempting it – a steadily building collection, limited runs of products. [Moi ici: Em vez de começar com uma colecção inteira, começou com alguns produtos e com edições limitadas] I’ve bought a couple to try out – and I’ve had to wait a couple of months until the first t-shirt I wanted was back in stock."

Interessante, o uso de uma revista em papel, para a apresentação dos conteúdos que ajudam a situar a marca, a desenvolver a mística da marca. Interessante a comparação que o autor faz acerca da qualidade da revista, por comparação com revistas para corredores:

"As a runner, I’m used to technical, functional and often pretty unstylish clothing and – frankly – content. Runners World is the staple periodical for runners. It’s good for tips and motivation, but stylish and beautifully designed it is not – and its website is an embarrassment (I say that as a paying subscriber). It’s aspirational in a performance sense, but running as a culture and a lifestyle, not so much." 

Depois, descreve a embalagem e o reforço da ligação entre o cliente e a marca ainda antes de chegar à peça, com o número e a mensagem.
.
Este trecho:

"Since it started, earlier this year, Tracksmith has been selling a small but growing – one or two items at a time – collection of clothing" 

Merece ser sublinhado. Julgo que quem arranca com uma marca nova, porque tem de primeiro passar pelo filtro do dono da prateleira, tem de o seduzir com o aspecto do produto, com a qualidade do produto e com o potencial de ganho com o produto; por isso, tem de avançar com uma "colecção completa". No entanto, quem avança para uma loja online própria, não tem de passar por esse filtro, pode começar sem ter essa colecção "completa", pode começar com uma gama mais pequena e com uma forte identidade, para depois, crescer lentamente no número de SKU.
.
BTW, aquele "As a runner, I’m used to technical, functional and often pretty unstylish clothing" fez-me recordar este texto lido ontem de manhã "Cooler than Your Dad’s Sweatpants: Mr Porter Launches Athleisure"

Ainda acerca das marcas em Mongo

"Acquirers have decisively moved from investing into businesses with strong brands to businesses with strong customer relationships.
...
That suggests that marketing resources now directed at brand building should be more fully integrated with those designed to reinforce relationships. The value of “brand” or “brand image” as an entity distinct from the offering itself, we think, will diminish. However, marketers should be careful not to take this too far and underinvest in classic branding. With brand messages becoming more and more individualized and diverse, [Moi ici: O que poderá ser este "diverse"? Não pode ser tão "diverse" que deixe de pertencer a uma tribo] brand equity needs to stay strong to perform its overall integrative role. Strong brand communications are and will remain important especially in attracting new customers and in enhancing desirability for higher price premiums."

Como tenho escrito ao longo dos anos, acredito que o problema não está no conceito de marca, o problema está no que as empresas têm andado a fazer com as marcas, retirando-lhes mística, retirando-lhes magia, sugando-as por dentro até não passarem de uma carcaça oca enganadora:

• Leu aqui há vários anos ... (Julho de 2014);
• um sintoma de que doença(s)? (Abril de 2014)
• O papel da marca em Mongo (Fevereiro de 2014)

Marcas de Mongo são símbolos da autenticidade de uma tribo e, uma tribo é tão forte quanto mais fortes forem as relações entre os seus membros. Muitas marcas do século XX não criaram verdadeiras relações, apenas canais de comunicação unidireccional.

Trecho retirado de "Why Strong Customer Relationships Trump Powerful Brands"

Iludidas com a democratização do luxo (parte II)

Parte I.
.
Ainda há dias descobri que até a Chanel se está a ressentir da ilusão da democratização do luxo, "Louis Vuitton sigue los pasos de Chanel con una bajada de precios del 18% en China".
.
Por isso, cuidado com estas histórias "Deluxe. O luxo quando nasce é para todos"

Iludidas com a democratização do luxo

Primeiro, um convite para recordar a leitura de "Eu pensava duas vezes..." e o texto sobre a evolução da Gucci.
.
Depois, a leitura de "Handbag Prices Begin to Hit Their Limit".
.
Qual a mensagem do artigo? O mercado não aguenta e as marcas estão a recuar nos preços, lançando modelos mais pequenos:

"Facing resistance, Gucci, Prada and Fendi add smaller styles at lower prices
...
What started as a fashion trend away from big, bulky bags to slimmer looks has created an opportunity for companies to court shoppers who aren’t willing to spend $4,000 on a purse."

Para o justificar arranjam-se argumentos que só demonstram a ignorância de quem escreve, ao relacionar luxo, preço, inflação e custo:

"The moves follow a rapid rise in prices over the past decade that has far outpaced increases in the cost of labor and materials. Sarah Willersdorf, a principal with the Boston Consulting Group, analyzed the pricing of seven luxury handbag brands from 2002 to 2012. On average, prices rose 14% a year over that period, far more than the 2.5% annual increase in inflation."

Já quase no fim do artigo encontra-se um pormaior, ao arrepio do título e da mensagem:

"The downward pressure on pricing doesn’t apply to all companies. Analysts say Hermès and Chanel still have strong pricing power, fueled in part by strategies that keep their best-selling items in short supply." 

Pois... há empresas que têm uma marca e que a tratam de forma a reforçar o seu poder e, empresas que desbaratam a marca iludidas com a quantidade, iludidas com a democratização do luxo.
.
O defeito é meu, mas quando se copia a actuação estratégica da Gucci, fico sempre de pé atrás.

"your brand is a story"

Excelente mensagem de Seth Godin sobre a diferença entre um logo e uma marca em "Logo vs. Brand":

"Your logo is a referent, a symbol, a reminder of your brand.
.
But your brand is a story, a set of emotions and expectations and a stand-in for how we think and feel about what you do."

Votos de um Bom 2015

"A commodity business is a bottom-line operation of cold calculation.
A brand disrupts commodities with cultural value beyond calculation.
.
Marketing models people as potential buyers.
Brand strategy models people as potential co-creators of value.
Very different approaches."

Tweets de @brandstrat

O desconto corrói a marca

""Any damn fool can put on a deal, but it takes genius, faith and perseverance to create a brand,"
...
From a brand equity perspective the implications of "discount creep" on brands should not be overlooked. Discounting will give retailers a short-term advantage over competitors, but it can come with perhaps unforeseen consequences.
.
Truth: Leading with low prices cheapens your brand. Sure, people will rush out to buy your product, prompting a spike in sales. But at the same time, customers will be so focused on price they will lose sight of the intrinsic value in paying full retail price.
.
The biggest risk to relying on discounts to drive sales is that it becomes the definitive narrative in your brand story.
...
"When you offer a discount, you are taking the focus from the value you provide and placing it squarely on your price. There is no way to escape that."
...
As discounting has become more prevalent, many have forgotten that making a sale should not be about discounts and concessions that devalue your brand. Instead, it is a challenge to create more demand within your target audience to inspire purchase at the posted price.
...
So what does a brand like Perrier do? They go deep in their ethos and find fresh ways to elevate the brand and keep it relevant.
...
In a world where a CEO's life expectancy averages well under five years and brand marketers are measured by short-term financial results, the seductiveness of selling out to sell more is hard to resist. For a long-term strategy, consider striving for the things that create brand value. Otherwise it becomes a race to zero. And that's no way to spend the holidays."

Recordar as curvas de isolucro, para relacionar aumento de volume necessário para compensar descontos em "Pregarás o Evangelho do Valor"
.
Recordar:

• "O impacte dos descontos"
• "Arrepios"

Trechos retirados de "The Race to Zero: Time to Rethink 'Discount' Mentality"

Para reflexão sobre as marcas

"In a study of a 1995 surge in counterfeiting in the Chinese shoe market, Yi Qian of the University of British Columbia found that the entry of fakes had the effect of increasing sales of high-end authentic shoes by 63%. The arrival of counterfeits on the market affirmed the value of the brands in consumers’ minds and in many cases introduced the brands to new customers. At the low end, however, counterfeits merely ate into the brands’ sales."

Trecho retirado de "Counterfeiting as a Form of Free Advertising"

Desenvolver uma marca

"I read an article by the creative director of a large international ad agency. He said his advertising is not intended to sell products. The objective is to “build brands.”
...

What could possibly be a better indicator of whether a brand is being built than whether people are willing to spend their money to buy it?
.

First of all, you can’t separate selling products from building brands. The idea of taking a deconstructionist view of brands— that they are somehow discrete from the products they represent—has led to the phenomenon of brands without content, the product equivalents of empty suits. We’ve heard their names, we’ve seen their ads, but we have no idea what they are, what they do, or why we should want them.
...

Second, the brand babblers are wrong about how great brands are built. They think they can do it with shortcuts—with branding. So instead of a brand being an intrinsic, organic thing that evolves over time from (a) the true essence of a company and (b) carefully conceived product advertising, they have turned it into a contrivance that they tack on. It’s the Dennis Rodman school of marketing: if you don’t have a personality, get
some tattoos.
...

Great brands have never been created by “branding.” Great brands have been created by excellent product advertising and patience.
.
Brands need character, not tattoos.
...

As soon as brand became a verb, branding became an activity. And as soon as it became an activity, it turned into an industry with lots of incompetent practitioners and 29,777 how-to books. Well, I’m here to save you a little reading and a lot of money. The idea that a strong brand can be created through branding is wrong.
...

Some things can only be achieved indirectly. You can’t be happy by trying to be happy. If you want to be happy you have to go fishing, or eat a pizza, or clean out your closet.
...

Sometimes, the more actively and directly you address a problem, the worse it gets. It’s the same in marketing. You want to have a strong brand? Quit branding. A strong brandis a by-product. It comes from doing a lot of other things right. For example:

1. Make sure you’re selling excellent products.
2. Make sure you’re taking good care of your customers.
3. Make sure your ads demonstrate how you are different from and better than your competitors.

That’s what builds brands, and that’s all you need to know. The rest is chitchat."

Trechos retirados de "The Ad Contrarian" e-book.

Again, repit with me: Value is a feeling, not a calculation

Uma vez mais Greg Satell nails it com "4 Things to Know About Brand Value":
.
"brands are conceptual. They allow us to dream, to think of things other than logistics and pricing and firing people. Reflecting on brands help us escape from the drudgery of work." (Moi ici: As marcas fogem à matematização... mas não as marcas ôcas, porque se tornaram ôcas, porque se radioclubeportuguisaram, e já só são um nome, uma carcaça exterior. Sim as marcas que continuam a queimar as pestasnas a arranjar formas de surpreender os potenciais clientes)
.
"1. A Brand is a Promise

Usually when people think about brands they think about logos and marketing slogans, but a brand is much more than that.  ... brand value is the value of promises made and kept." (Moi ici: Actualmente ando com outra ideia na cabeça. E quando compramos um artigo que saiu melhor do que a encomenda? E quando compramos um artigo e, com o começo do uso, o valor que lhe atribuímos continua a crescer? O potencial de valor que o fabricante podia capturar ainda mais... e, como já escrevi aqui no blogue e comentava com um empresário esta semana, é tão comum os empresários portugueses subestimarem-se... não apostam na comunicação, no marketing e, depois, são como Figos que morrem a jogar no Pastilhas para sempre... ou pior, jogam no Pastilhas e outros é que capturam o valor)

...

"2. Brands Have Tangible Value

There is a reason that companies spend billions of dollars every year to make promises and go to such great lengths to keep them:  Money.  Cold hard cash.  Moolah and lots of it!"

...

"4. Emotions Build Brands

While brands are financial entities, they are built through emotions. As I wrote in an earlier post, emotions are like a little yellow highlighter in our brains. They’re powerful because they bypass the rational center in our forebrains and go straight to embedding themselves in our brain’s synaptic pathways.
.
From an evolutionary perspective, emotions helped us remember what was important. When we saw a rustle in the bushes and our best friend got eaten by a lion, it was important to be able to remember the incident without repetition (a luxury man eating lions are unlikely to grant).

That’s why as much as we would like to think otherwise, decision making tends to be driven by emotions rather than rationality. Great brands are built through emotional associations."
.
E como é que isso acontece na sua empresa? É deixado ao acaso ou é desenhado?

Agarrem-me senão eu mato-me!!! (parte X)

Esta é uma saga clássica neste blogue (parte VIII e parte IX).

.

A experiência é o produto... cada vez mais:

.

"They've been a huge hit with shoppers looking for a value treat and they've surprised tasters with their quality. So how are the big brands squaring up to supermarket Champagnes, asks Emma Eversham

When six professional tasters blind-tasted a range of Champagnes for the December 2006 Which? Magazine, no-one would have predicted the effect the results would have on sales of one in particular.

Sainsbury's Taste the Difference Premier Cru 2000 beat big-name brands - including best-seller Moët & Chandon - to the top of the list and customers couldn't get to the wine aisle quickly enough.

Sales rocketed by 3,000 per cent and demand was so great that by Christmas Sainsbury's had sold half its stock for the year ahead."

.

As grandes marcas ("It is interesting that many top Champagne houses are producing Champagne for supermarkets and other retailers to sell under their own name.") entram no jogo da distribuição. A distribuição é como uma cobra pitão, vai preparar o seu aperto mortal...

.

É claro que é atraente (e aditivo) vender quantidade via a grande distribuição, ainda que com o seu, deles, nome, ... como é que escreveu Seth Godin acerca das pequenas mudanças e do seu poder?

.

Só que isto reforça o valor percebido nas marcas das private labels e, por consequência, reduz o poder das marcas próprias. Daqui a uns anos vão juntar-se, medrosas, sob uma qualquer Centromarca e invectivar a grande distribuição.

.

Trecho retirado de "Own-labels have all guns blazing in bubbly wars".

.

"The first age of private label was as a simple, budget purchase for hard-up consumers. In 1919 ..."

"The second age of private label was a move upmarket. Marks & Spencer began to sell its own products under the St Michael brand in 1928. Named after the founder of the company Michael Marks, the brand came to stand for quality and value to three generations of British shoppers and demonstrated the potential of private labels to provide more than simply a budget offering."

...

"The third age began in 1992 with the launch of Sainsbury's Novon washing detergent. Rather than representing a cheap, budget equivalent closely aligned to the store master brand, Novon was a standalone product. Thanks to in-store promotions, Novon quickly doubled Sainsbury's share of the detergent category and proved that private labels could stand on their own merits."

...

"The fourth age marked a period when private labels became brazen in their attempts to replicate and replace manufacturer brands. In 1996"
...
"The fifth age of private label was a move beyond parity and replication toward superiority. Following the successful example of Canadian supermarket Loblaws, Tesco launched a line of super-premium private-label products under the Finest sub-brand. They often retailed for more than the manufacturer equivalents and were of higher quality.

The sixth age has seen a shift away from basic store brands toward a brand architecture of private labels. The big supermarkets have moved from a simple house structure to use private-label sub-brands to offer distinct organic, budget, healthy and premium lines - a multifaceted offering that surrounds manufacturer brands on all sides.

Last week saw early evidence of the next step for private labels: category leadership. Asda has launched tea bags made from nylon mesh under its premium Extra Special label. These tea bags cost about four times the price of traditional paper ones. What's important here is that there was nothing like it being sold in Asda by a big-name brand. Until now, for all their advancement, private labels have been second movers: undercutting and improving on big-brand offerings, but always following. Now, however, supermarkets are using store data, category knowledge and strong supplier relationships to begin to lead the market.

The real golden era of private labels is only just beginning and manufacturers are glimpsing the true challenge that awaits them. Brand managers will have to compete against private labels that are cheaper, more premium, more profitable, better merchandised, more trusted and easier to market - and face the prospect of trying to enter categories created, and now led, by private labels."

.

Trechos retirados de "Mark Ritson on branding: Private label is ready to take you on"

Outras associações

Aranha, aconteceu-me uma gira hoje:

.

Olho para um artigo que se usa na nossa indumentária e começo a apreciar os atributos e a ficar bem impressionado com eles...

.

Depois, reparo que os artigos da loja, maioria private label, agora trazem um identificador da marca no exterior...

.

Rapidamente começo a ser invadido por n associações negativas despertadas pelo identificador e a decidir que não, que não vou dar oportunidade aos atributos.

Deixem as empresas morrer, se querem criar a economia do futuro, deixem de apoiar as empresas do passado

Peres Metelo no DN:
.
"Por causa das nossas debilidades de fundo, carregadas há muitos e maus anos: baixo investimento no capital humano conduz a baixa produtividade e incapacidade para a aumentar; logo, baixa competitividade externa e evolução negativa dos termos de troca conduzem ao esmagamento das margens de lucro das empresas exportadoras; logo, mantém-se baixo o nível de poupança, quer das empresas não financeiras quer das famílias; logo, aumenta todos os anos a necessidade de financiamento externo, com acumulação de défices gémeos (o orçamental e o da balança de transacções correntes), e um endividamento líquido externo que já atinge um ano completo de produção no País de bens e serviços finais - vulgo, 100% do PIB." (aqui)

.

Aquele ponto de partida é que me faz cócegas... por que é que cerca de 100 licenciados abandonam o país por mês? Como já repeti várias vezes o raciocínio de Galbraith, como é que trabalhadores mais formados contribuem para o aumento da produtividade?

.

O aumento da produtividade que precisamos como país:

• um aumento que seja um salto e não umas migalhas incrementais;
• um aumento que proporcione margens muito maiores às empresas; (lembram-se do gráfico de Frasquilho?)
• um aumento que proporcione melhores salários aos trabalhadores; (senão algo está mal, o fim último é a felicidade sustentada dos povos e é isso que o PIB não mede)
• um aumento da competitividade das empresas.

Um aumento da produtividade com estas características só pode ser da responsabilidade da gestão. Só que a palavra gestão está mal aplicada aqui, precisamos mais de insurgentes visionários que lideram equipas para um futuro desejado novo e diferente do actual e precisamos menos de gestores, de organizadores do status-quo medíocre em que vegetamos e sobrevivendo com uma capacidade competitiva cada vez mais erodida.

.

Há dias escrevi este postal "Um revés", ontem, Hable e Hogan no seu livro "The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing", num capítulo dedicado à criação de valor, disseram-me:

.

"Sometimes, when an offering has significant intangible value, such as brand strength, received value can exceed true economic value. That's frequently the case with many consumer products when deft advertising and merchandising invest a product with strong emotional values such as prestige, safety, hope, or reassurance. Perceptions rather than physical characteristics provide the differentiated value a product holds for the buyer. Packaged goods with more or less the same physical attributes as the competition nonetheless command price premiuns because their credible superiority claims create the perception of differentiated value,"

.

É impossível que uma massa crítica de empresas dê o salto e crie um novo paradigma económico, e crie o mercado de trabalho para quem tem mais qualificações, e proporcione os aumentos referidos acima enquanto continuarmos a gastar recursos a defender as empresas do passado e não criarmos as condições para que a destruição criativa opere.

.

E não há como fugir da realidade, a mudança só vai acontecer, só acontece quando pessoas concretas, empresários, fazem o seu caminho de Damasco particular e descobrem a luz... há um outro mundo, há outras estratégias, há outros modelos de negócio, para competir.

Uma marca é uma marca! Será mesmo?

Aranha!

O que é uma marca?

Poderá existir uma marca sem produto?

Uma marca é a alma de um produto... ou o resultado de um algoritmo?

Weird story "We are searching for a different winery for this brand"

Não sacrificar a marca

Um importante conselho de Ram Charan no seu livro “Leadership in the Era of Economic Uncertainty", nestes tempos de crise: não sacrificar a marca, não estragar num ápice o que tanto custou a desenvolver:

“Brand identity is extremely valuable to your company as a long-term differentiator. Although there is clearly a major trend for consumers to move from branded products to private-label products, brand will remain a valuable asset. You need to be sure the customer’s experience with your product lives up to the promise of the brand. Do not give in to the temptation to sacrifice identity by cheapening the product.

…

A brand reputation takes a long time to build. It is something you cannot afford to lose.”

Um exemplo do poder das marcas "The Enduring Power of Brand: Leica vs Panasonic" (por isto é que um japonês com que trabalhei nos anos 90 do século passado, apesar de conhecer alguns problemas dos Alfa-Romeo (era a sua profissão descobri-los) adorava e invejava a marca.