Vamos viver uma época de partos difíceis

Uma parte importante da economia privada vive e viverá um tempo de mudança. Muitas empresas ou já fecharam ou vão fechar em breve, outras vão ter de renascer para tentarem adaptar-se a um novo nível do jogo competitivo.

Há muito que escrevo aqui sobre a relação entre a biologia e a economia. Por isso, sublinhei:

"We found that populations under strong selection ... subsequently evolved ... most rapidly ... Compared to populations under weak or no selection, they reached higher green fluorescence during each generation of phase II and evolved a green emission peak more rapidly. Strong selection promoted both the elimination of deleterious mutations and the accumulation of foldability-improving mutations. As a result, proteins under strong selection evolved higher efficiency of protein folding (foldability) and, to an even greater extent, higher robustness to mutations than proteins under weak or no selection."

Vivemos, viveremos, pois tempos de evolução acelerada... 

Talvez por isso nos últimos dias tenho encontrado vários artigos sobre a transformação das empresas. Por exemplo, "Why Business Transformation Efforts Often Fail".

No Twitter ainda uso como avatar a mesma imagem desde 2004:

A imagem é sobre a urgência em agir:

• O sentido de urgência (Agosto de 2008)
• Sentido de urgência (Abril de 2016)

Conheço John Kotter há muito tempo:

"Not Establishing a Great Enough Sense of Urgency

“Bad business results are both a blessing and a curse in the first phase. On the positive side, losing money does catch people’s attention.  But it also gives less maneuvering room.  With good business results, the opposite is true: convincing people of the need for change is much harder, but you have more resources to help make changes.”

...

Strong leadership is required to rally a company into action.  “A paralyzed senior management often comes from having too many managers and not enough leaders,” said Kotter.  “Management’s mandate is to minimize risk and to keep the current system operating.  Change, by definition, requires creating a new system, which in turn always demands leadership.  Phase one in a renewal process typically goes nowhere until enough real leaders are promoted or hired into senior-level jobs.”"

Outros sublinhados:

"Lacking a Vision

“In every successful transformation effort that I have seen, the guiding coalition develops a picture of the future that is relatively easy to communicate and appeals to customers, stockholders, and employees,” noted Kotter.

...

[Moi ici: Lembrei-me logo da TAP ao ler o trecho que se segue] Undercommunicating the Vision by a Factor of Ten

“Transformation is impossible unless hundreds or thousands of people are willing to help, often to the point of making short-term sacrifices, wrote Kotter.  “Employees will not make sacrifices, even if they are unhappy with the status quo unless they believe that useful change is possible.  Without credible communication, and a lot of it, the hearts and minds of the troops are never captured.”

Transformative changes are generally based on new, innovative ideas that few may understand in their early stages.  It’s thus important to explain what’s unique and different about the new innovation to key constituencies, including clients, partners, analysts, reporters, and, most important, the company’s own employees. Effective communications are thus essential."

                 

Strategy and the Fat Smoker (parte I)

Do livro "Strategy and the Fat Smoker" de David Maister retiro:

.

"What is very hard is actually doing what you know to be good for you in the long-run, in spite of short-run temptations.
...
In the past two-and-a-half decades, I have been trusted to see a large number of strategic plans from a wide variety of professional firms around the world, including direct competitors. What is immediately noteworthy is how similar (if not identical) they all are.
.
This is not because anyone is being stupid, but because everyone is smart. Every competitor is smart enough to analyze the market and spot which sectors are growing and which are in decline. Few competitors get it wrong. Everyone - absolutely everyone - can see which services and products are "hot" and which are becoming commodities.
.
What is more, everyone understands the basis of business success: provide outstanding client service, act like team players, provide a good place to work, invest in your future. No sensible firm (or person) would enunciate a strategy that advocated anything else.
...
However, just because something is obvious doesn't make it easy. Real strategy lies not in figuring out what to do, but in devising ways to ensure that, compared to others, we actually do more of what everybody knows they should do.
...
Real strategy lies not in figuring out what to do, but in devising ways to ensure that, compared to others, we actually do more of what everybody knows they should do.
...
We know what to do, we know why we should do it, and we know how to do it. Yet most businesses and individuals don't do what's good for them.
...
The rewards (and pleasure) are in the future; the disruption, discomfort and discipline needed to get there are immediate.
...
The necessary outcome of strategic planning is not analytical insight but resolve."
.
Este último ponto "is not analytical insight but resolve" é fundamental... é, por vezes, desesperante, como reflectimos aqui: "O sentido da urgência", "Instilar um sentido de urgência!" e "Procrastinação e falta de sentido de urgência".

.

Em linha com um artigo de Junho de 2008 da Harvard Business Review "The Secrets to Successful Strategy Execution":

.

"Employees at three out of every five companies rated their organization weak at execution—that is, when asked if they agreed with the statement “Important strategic and operational decisions are quickly translated into action,” the majority answered no.
.
Execution is the result of thousands of decisions made every day by employees acting according to the information they have and their own self-interest. In our work helping more than 250 companies learn to execute more effectively, we’ve identified four fundamental building blocks executives can use to influence those actions—clarifying decision rights, designing information flows, aligning motivators, and making changes to structure.)"

Várias leituras (parte III)

Continuado daqui.

.

Gary Hamel põe o dedo na ferida em "What Really Kills Great Companies: Inertia"

.

A inércia, a falta de sentido de urgência, corrói, quer as grandes, quer as pequenas empresas.

.

"In most organizations, change comes in only two flavors: trivial and traumatic. Review the history of the average organization and you’ll discover long periods of incremental fiddling punctuated by occasional bouts of frantic, crisis-driven change. The dynamic is not unlike that of arteriosclerosis: after years of relative inactivity, the slow accretion of arterial plaque is suddenly revealed by the business equivalent of a myocardial infarction. The only option at that juncture is a quadruple bypass: excise the leadership team, slash head count, dump “non-core” assets and overhaul the balance sheet.
.
Why does change have to happen this way? Why does a company have to frustrate its shareholders, infuriate its customers and squander much of its legacy before it can reinvent itself? It’s easy to blame leaders who’ve fallen prey to denial and nostalgia, but the problem goes deeper than that. Organizations by their very nature are inertial."

.

Lembro-me de em 2004 ter uma conversa com um gestor sobre as orientações que tinha da casa-mãe nórdica e algumas ideias de Tom Peters que defendia que é tão difícil e moroso mudar a cultura de uma empresa que é mais fácil e rápido fechar a fábrica antiga, para abrir uma nova fábrica de raiz, com uma nova cultura deliberada de raiz.

I rest my case... open up your eyes!!!

Ontem recebi na caixa do correio electrónico uma referência a um livro novo intitulado "Cut Cost, Grow Stronger" de Shumeet Banerji, Paul Leinwand e Cesare Mainardi.
.
Pelo título, a minha primeira reacção foi negativa... mais um grupo a promover os cortes nos custos como a terapia de eleição. Não suporto essa postura típica de macro-economista , ou de burocrata de Bruxelas... afinal, que manobras sabem equacionar para lá das lineares de Lanchester.
.
Contudo, resolvi fazer das tripas coração e ler a introdução do livro... e em boa hora o fiz.
.
"We reject the idea that cutting costs in itself makes a business weaker or more limited. To be sure, if you reduce expenses in a panic, or without an eye to strat­egy, you could do great harm to your company’s competitiveness. But if you focus on your priorities and on your future potential, cutting costs can be a catalyst for ex­actly the change a company needs. (Moi ici: alto... há aqui qualquer coisa que pode ter interesse. Relacionar corte de custos com a estratégia, ou melhor, o pânico, se for controlado, pode ser canalizado para desencadear uma reflexão estratégica profunda que esteja em atraso. O perigo de morte abre os olhos dos intervenientes e gera o sense of urgency de que fala Kotter.)
.
Unfortunately, many companies are cutting expenses ineffectively. They either spread the pain as evenly as they can across all parts of the business or they target high-cost areas first. And they look for short-term reductions without fully considering the impact on their long-term position or prospects." (Moi ici: OK, esta é a parte que eu temo, a reacção instintiva de cortar 10% em todo o lado sem qualquer reflexão, sem qualquer justificação... normalmente resulta em tiros nos pés.)
...
"The right way to think about costs — whether your company is under pressure now or marshalling resources for the future — is to look at the capabilities you need most and to invest only in those that will give you a clear advantage in reaching the customers you care about most. (Moi ici: Please, rewind and read the underlined text again... aquele trecho precioso... "the customers you care about most". Os clientes-alvo!!! Se as capacidades que permitem servir os clientes-alvo forem prejudicadas... Houston, we have a big problem. Mas se virarmos o tabuleiro, podemos pensar no que estamos a desperdiçar agora mesmo ao trabalhar para os clientes que não são clientes-alvo! Ainda há dias escrevi sobre o equivalente à lei de Gresham: clientes-alvo são expulsos pelos clientes que não são clientes-alvo. A coisa está a ficar interessante.) This approach involves a new way of thinking about capabilities. They need to be seen for what they are: a defining factor in productivity, a critical element of success, and a major factor in determining strategy."
.
(Moi ici: Depois, encontro um trecho que me faz logo recordar um dos melhores livros que li de Ram Charan, um livro escrito em parceria com Larry Bossidy, "Confronting Reality - Doing What Matters to Get Things Right".)
...
"In our experience, the most dramatic, significant, and successful cost reductions, in either the short term or the long run, aren’t those that are simply prompted by financial analyses. They have all occurred in situations when management realized that it had to truly transform. The process wasn’t expense reduction as usual; it involved real fear — a sense that “If we don’t change, we may not survive.” These urgent situations provide exactly the right impetus to make critical strategic changes." (Moi ici: é este 'impetus' que dá a força, o momento para vencer a inércia, para obrigar a fazer o que já devia ter sido feito hà muito tempo... por isso é que a introdução ao livro de Bossidy e Charan tem o subtítulo de "Break with the past".)
.
Depois, os autores apresentam um caso concreto, um exemplo. Não o vou transcrever aqui porque pode ser lido facilmente na hiperligação que fiz acima.
.
Se lerem esse caso... de certeza que vão sorrir ao começar a encontrar pistas para temas que normalmente são apresentados neste blogue.
...
"Most important, they saw that the complexity of the company’s product line was hurting its long-term profitability (Moi ici: os meus mestres Skinner e Hill escreveram-no, a minha figura 12 ilustra-o.) and needed to be addressed. Johnson Controls’ huge volume of sales ... had covered up the fact that certain parts of the business were subscale; (Moi ici: ainda esta semana, usando as equações de Baker voltamos à carga com as ideias de Hermann Simon: volume is vanity, profit is sanity.) they required an investment in capabilities that was greater than what they earned back in profits. The capabilities (which were focused on manufacturing, sales, and certain types of R&D) required to produce and market high-volume batteries turned out to be very different from those required to make and distribute the wide variety of batteries for more specialized or lower-volume vehicles. (Moi ici: olha a novidade! O que é pena é que tenham de ser as circunstâncias excepcionais, as situações de quasi-morte a abrir os olhos dos gestores.)
.
In part by focusing on their mass-market, high-volume customers, the managers at Johnson Controls were able to immediately identify 35 percent cuts in overhead, in areas as diverse as accounting, human resources, and information technology, without hurting the most profitable parts of their business." (Moi ici: I rest my case)

O sentido de urgência é um must

Uma das facetas que mais me preocupa e irrita no "corporate" Portugal é a falta de ritmo, é a lentidão. As coisas são para se ir fazendo, não há rapidez, não há zest, não há sentido de urgência.

.

Estranho que num projecto onde se define o futuro estratégico de uma empresa, muitas vezes, demasiadas vezes, seja o consultor a impor o ritmo. Como é que a fome pelo futuro da minha empresa não há-de ser o maior desafio profissional da empresa e dos seus colaboradores?

.

O que dizer acerca dos prazos? Não são para cumprir, alteram-se com a maior das facilidades e sem remorsos. Por vezes digo, e levam-me a mal, "Não podemos ser como a Igreja Católica! Que está cá há dois mil anos e espera estar por cá, pelo menos, outros tantos. Somos uma estrela cadente, o nosso tempo é curto"

.

Por exemplo, e quando audito o departamento de inovação de empresas e constato que os prazos dos projectos são sistematicamente alargados!!! Em vez de urgência temos calvário.

.

Qual o propósito de um departamento de inovação? Pôr projectos. materializados em produtos, na rua!

.

Então, adoptando uma mentalidade pull devíamos começar por aí e revolucionar a forma como se gerem os projectos.

.

O livro "The Art of Innovation" escrito por Tom Kelley da IDEO chama a atenção para a importância do timing e da urgência.

Ao equacionar em abstracto a proposta de valor da inovação, tenho sempre aquele atributo, ser o primeiro a chegar ao mercado, e para isso o timing é fundamental.

.

Alguns recortes do livro:

.

"First, they were totally dedicated to achieving the end result... Second, they faced down a slightly ridiculous deadline. When the hurdle is high, there's a tremendous sense of achievement in getting anything done by the deadline."

...

"Over the years I've noticed some patterns. Products that become hits seem to enjoy a balance of features, price, and that often elusive element of timing."

...

"Speed counts. It gets products to market in time for the holiday shopping season. It leapfrogs established players before they can get off the ground. It implants your brand in consumers' hearts and minds before your competitors have left the starting gate. ... It's not enough to master the basics. You must master them in prime time, under the stress of competition, under the glare of a client losing patience."