Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta jobs-to-be-done. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta jobs-to-be-done. Mostrar todas as mensagens

terça-feira, dezembro 27, 2016

"É o que te chateia, é o que te cria desconforto no trabalho"

Na semana passada em conversa com empresário sobre as actividades de melhoria que patrocina na sua empresa, apontei esta frase sobre como define melhoria na sua comunicação com os operários:
"O que é melhoria? É o que te chateia, é o que te cria desconforto no trabalho"
Logo na altura sorri ao ouvir a frase porque a associei logo a isto:
"I think I have as many jobs of not wanting to do something as ones that I want positively to do. I call them “negative jobs.” In my experience, negative jobs are often the best innovation opportunities."
Trecho retirado de "Competing Against Luck"

Um exemplo de miopia na vida real (parte II)

Recomendo vivamente a leitura da parte I.

Posso ser um anónimo consultor da província mas costumo falhar menos que os das empresas com muitos zeros antes da vírgula.
"Exoskeletons are wearable robots designed to move or strengthen limbs. Already, lower-body models help paralysis patients in clinics around the world. As long as the devices can continue to shed weight and cost, they should become common as replacements for wheelchairs within five years, says Homayoon Kazerooni, founder of two of the companies below."
Interessante e previsível que estes avanços sejam feitos por outsiders, Os gigantes do sector estão concentrados no produto, na solução, em vez de no JTBD. Imagino-os entretidos em jogadas de consolidação do mercado e em aperfeiçoamentos incrementais da herança.


Trechos retirados de "Robotic Exoskeletons Are Helping People Walk Again"

sexta-feira, dezembro 23, 2016

"it is the situation and not the solution that drives the need for a job"

"Management guru Peter Drucker has said that "The customer rarely buys what the business thinks it sells him". Let’s see what this means by using the JTBD lens.
Consider this story:
A scuba centre advertised its dive-certification course in direct mailing lists purchased from diving magazines.
The assumed JTBD: an aspiring diver wanting to learn diving and having a certificate to prove it at the end.
But after gathering purchase stories from customers, the owner found that many were recently engaged couples planning wedding trips to the Caribbean.
The real JTBD: newlyweds wanting to spend quality time with each other by learning a new skill.
With this knowledge the owner advertised in bridal magazines and saw his classrooms filled during traditionally lull periods.
...
The reason people "rarely buy what the business thinks it sells them" is because it is the situation and not the solution that drives the need for a job. The newlyweds found themselves in a situation where the scuba centre was the best-fit solution for their job.
Note that there could have been substitute solutions—other solutions that could have been hired to do the same job, such as a skydiving centre—but scuba diving centre won, perhaps based on a set of success criteria the newlyweds had for the job."

Trechos retirados de "The Job-To-Be-Done Theory for designers"

terça-feira, dezembro 20, 2016

Volume é vaidade, lucro é sanidade

"O britânico Barclays está a preparar-se para dizer a sete mil clientes para realizarem mais transacções com o banco ou procurarem outra instituição, de acordo com a Bloomberg. O objectivo desta medida é impulsionar as receitas.
...
O banco britânico lançou um novo sistema informático, o Flight Deck, que classifica cada cliente da sua unidade de "trading" de acordo com o retorno que gera para a instituição. Assim, o Barclays pode dar prioridade à relação com os clientes que são mais lucrativos e descartar aqueles que não dão grandes contributos para o retorno do banco, segundo a mesma fonte.
.
A instituição financeira britânica eliminou, desde 2014, 17 mil clientes devido às regras mais duras no que diz respeito ao retorno de capital. Com este novo sistema agora implantado, mais sete mil clientes do Barclays podem ter de procurar uma nova instituição financeira, escreve a Bloomberg."
Quem lê estes trechos não pode deixar de sorrir e recordar marcadores que este blogue utiliza há quase uma década:

  • Stobachoff - aquele "classifica cada cliente da sua unidade de "trading" de acordo com o retorno que gera para a instituição" tem tudo a ver com a curva de Stobachoff
  • Clientes-alvo - um dos primeiros marcadores usados neste blogue. A importância de perceber para quem temos de trabalhar. Ao decidir deixar de trabalhar com 17 + 7 mil clientes não rentáveis a empresa percebe que não é o volume que interessa. Ao perceber que o mais importante é saber para quem não trabalhar (volto sempre a Hill e à magia de 2008), ao concentrar-se nos clientes-alvo há-de perceber que há um padrão nos JTBD e nos serviços prestados
  • Volume is vanity profit is sanity - frase usada aqui no blogue pela primeira vez em Julho de 2006. Como não recordar a empresa de calçado que me ensinou a metáfora da Arca de Noé em 2006.
Agora pensem nos outros bancos. O que dirão desta decisão?

domingo, dezembro 18, 2016

Um outro olhar

Há dias a propósito de:


Comentei no Twitter:
Em linha com uma opinião de anos. Recordar Abril de 2007:
"Assim, se a novidade tiver realmente potencial, a ALTEX pode estar a abrir, a pavimentar o caminho, para terceiros. Alguém no mercado, pode aperceber-se da vantagem tecnológica dos novos produtos da ALTEX, mas como não os desenvolveu, pode sentir e praticar um espírito de humildade, e aparecer à posteriori no mercado, com um produto parecido com o inovador, e um serviço diferenciador!!!"
Entretanto, ontem encontrei isto:
"we don’t believe there is any one right way to identify Jobs to Be Done. We’ve chosen to include here some ideas that may provide a different view through a jobs lens. As Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is fond of quoting, “Perspective is worth 80 I.Q. points.
...
A jobs lens changes what you see: the priorities and tradeoffs that customers are willing to make may look completely different, the competitive landscape shifts to a surprising cast of characters, and opportunity for growth appears where none might have seemed possible. Jobs are all around us, but it helps to know where to look and how to interpret what you find."
Trechos retirados de "Competing against luck"

sexta-feira, dezembro 16, 2016

"reforça-se ou entra em contradição?"

Isto, "Clarificar o posicionamento", não deixa de estar relacionado com "How to Prioritize Your Company’s Projects":
"Every organization needs what I call a “hierarchy of purpose.” Without one, it is almost impossible to prioritize effectively.
...
Take another real example: a postal service company delivering packages to customers. Like many other postal services, the company has been struggling to survive in an era of increasing competition and digital substitutes. Senior leaders gathered employees together at a series of town hall events where the CEO asked them to focus on two operational priorities: efficiency (reducing delivery times) and customer satisfaction (ensuring customers had a good experience).
.
One employee, Mary, got the message. And it worked fine until she was out delivering packages and was met at the door by an elderly man who asked her to come in and talk for a while. Mary’s natural inclination was to spend a little time with the lonely old man. It would be a kind thing to do, and surely it would also increase customer satisfaction. But then she froze. What about efficiency? If she spent even a few minutes chatting with her customer, her delivery times would suffer. What was she meant to do? Thousands of employees at this company were facing similar trade-offs every day."
Quem são os clientes-alvo?  Quais são os JTBD que a empresa assume como os mais importantes, aqueles em que pode fazer a diferença? A rede de actividades que os suporta reforça-se ou entra em contradição?


terça-feira, dezembro 13, 2016

Como é que a sua empresa se está a preparar

Primeiro as tendências:
"According to a U.S. Census Bureau report, within the next 15 years, the world will have close to a billion people over the age of 65, and for the first time in human history, people aged 65 and over will outnumber children under age 5 sometime before 2020."
Depois:
"os idosos representarão mais de 30% da população à distância de uma geração,
...
[Moi ici: E algo a fazer pensar no JTBDProximidade › Transporte Com constrangimentos de mobilidade, consumidores seniores escolhem fazer compras perto de casa. Até pelas dificuldades com pesos. Preços › Quantidade Constrangimentos financeiros e a menor dimensão dos agregados explicam a opção por menores gastos. Vão mais vezes às compras, mas compram em pouca quantidade e à medida das necessidades Socialização › Personalização Lojas de cidade, de menor dimensão e com maior personalização funcionam melhor junto dos mais idosos."
Como é que a sua empresa se está a preparar para este novo mundo?  Recordar "Push + pull + habit + anxiety" e "O que afasta os clientes".

Trechos retirados de "Idosos são consumidores fiéis e as promoções não os fazem mudar de lojas"

BTW, o texto é algo confuso: começa a sublinhar a relação dos idosos com as marcas brancas e acaba a sublinhar a relação dos idosos com as marcas próprias.

"to create an appropriate model of customer motivation "

"“Solutions come and go, but Jobs largely stay the same.”
...
the main intention of JTBD is to explain what the customer feels like they need to do to make their lives better. Zooming out reveals a more timeless struggle, but it’s vague, while zooming in is a little more granular and actionable, but also a lot more prone to modernization.
.
But the solutions we choose to help us get our jobs done come and go and vary depending on our situation.
...
JTBD is not about an individual. JTBD is about a market opportunity. ... But if there’s a market with that struggle today, it’s a pretty good bet there’s a market of people with that struggle tomorrow and a couple of years from now.
...
when we’re doing our research when we’re trying to apply the theory to innovation, we’re trying to build what I call a vector of progress. The whole idea is that we have to create an appropriate model of customer motivation that helps us predict what customers will buy in the future.
.
This thinking helps us understand what kind of data we need to gather, but also how we should model those data. Once we model those data, we can then figure out how to change the systems customers belong to. Not only that, but  we need a model that helps us change those systems in an evolutionary way. What I mean by that, is that if you don’t think in this evolutionary way, you can get too far ahead of your customers. This is what we call “out innovating” or building products that are ahead of their time."
Trechos retirados de "The North Star of an Enduring Business"

segunda-feira, dezembro 12, 2016

O que afasta os clientes

A propósito desta figura:
Este texto "With Uber and Lyft Nearby, Rental Cars May Be Ripe for a Comeuppance" ilustra muito bem a quantidade de situações que criam ansiedade e podem afastar um cliente.
"Every time I’ve traveled since Lyft and Uber achieved near ubiquity — whether for work or pleasure, trips long or short — I’ve tried my level best to avoid renting a car. And there’s no better way to explain why than to catalog every negative feeling the industry inspires on any given itinerary."

sábado, dezembro 10, 2016

"como antropólogo invisível"

Quem acompanha este blogue sabe o que leio, reflicto e escrevo sobre temas como: jobs to be done, service-dominant logic, interacção, co-criação e customer-centric, só para nomear alguns temas.

Estudo-os, penso neles e tento aplicar o que posso e julgo fazer sentido nas empresas com que trabalho. Faço-o porque acredito que são mais do que mambo-jambo de consultor para enganar empresas.

Confesso que fico algo chocado quando, como antropólogo invisível, entro num bar repleto de comerciais e marketeiros honestos e trabalhadores e a trabalhar em empresas com nome e só oiço uma coisa: empurrar, empurrar, empurrar os produtos que produzimos.

sexta-feira, dezembro 09, 2016

Fugir da conversa de pilha-galinhas

Para quem opera no B2B estes conselhos são importantes:
"Tie investments to outcomes. When you speak about your outcomes, tie the investment they are making to those outcomes. Explain exactly how the greater investment is necessary to producing the greater outcomes. Also, explain how a smaller investment puts those results at risk. Investments equal outcomes.
Help justify your price. If you want to protect your pricing, provide your contacts with the ability to justify the pricing inside their own organization. Give them the tools, the rationale, and the language to speak intelligently as to why your price is the right price to deliver the outcomes they need."
Recordo logo um caso com bombas centrífugas.

Recordo uma espécie de outcomes e outra.

E se ligarmos isto ao JTBD... é traduzir outcomes por progresso.

E se ligarmos isto ao pricing... é traduzir outcomes por value based pricing.

Recordo caso de um vendedor de soluções que tinha sucesso vendendo uma solução mais cara mas que permitia ao cliente menos tempo de paragem, menos transtorno para os clientes do cliente.

E não esquecer o conceito de ecossistema.

Trecho retirado de "How to Avoid the Need to Defend Your Price"

terça-feira, dezembro 06, 2016

Intercom on Jobs-to-be-Done (parte IV)

Parte Iparte II e parte III.

"Most purchases are made through habit, with no real consideration of alternatives. People order the same type of coffee, in the same coffee shop, every morning, because the cost of reassessing their options every day isn’t worth it. In short people rarely switch, but when they do, there’s an interesting set of dynamics at play. Whether it’s coffee or software most companies take the myopic route, and simply try to make their product look better than everyone else’s. That’s only ever one part of what makes people switch.
.
Switching is also about removing fear or hesitation associated with trying out your product and making sure you remind them of the problems with their current solution.
...
The way you motivate somebody to make a switch is the same for a friendship, a relationship, or a software product – identify the struggling moments your customers are experiencing and build around that. Emphasize why the existing way does not make sense, why it’s safe to switch to your product, and why they don’t need to worry about leaving the existing way behind. If you can solve all those things, you’ll get customers to switch.
...
People don’t hate progress, they just prefer inertia. This stops them from buying your product, even when it’s the logical choice.
...
Switching is a big deal, you see. Customers don’t buy a product, they switch to it from something else. Most businesses try to motivate a switch by having the best design, the best performance, or the most features. That only affects your product quality, one piece of the puzzle."

segunda-feira, dezembro 05, 2016

Intercom on Jobs-to-be-Done (parte III)

Parte I e parte II.

Estou cada vez mais fã deste exercício:
"The push of what is happening currently: “This mattress is pretty
uncomfortable. I’m waking up multiple times in the night with back
pain.”
The pull of a new solution: “If I get a new mattress, I can sleep better.
I’ll be in a better mood at home and at work.”
The anxiety of what could happen: “What if the new mattress turns
out to be just as bad as the old one? I can only try it out for a few
moments in the store.”
The attachment to what you currently have: “I’ve had this mattress
since college.”"
Julgo que é mais rico e intuitivo que:



Trecho retirado de 'Intercom on Jobs-to-be-Done'.

Imagem retirada daqui.

sexta-feira, dezembro 02, 2016

JTBD e estratégia

Um interessante artigo de Ulwick, "The Jobs-to-be-Done Growth Strategy Matrix” by Anthony Ulwick"
"The growth strategies introduced in this framework are defined as follows:
.
Differentiated strategy. A company pursues a differentiated strategy when it discovers and targets a population of underserved consumers with a new product or service offering that gets a job (or multiple jobs) done significantly better, but at a significantly higher price.
...
Dominant strategy. A company pursues a dominant strategy when it targets all consumers in a market with a new product or service offering that gets a job done significantly better and for significantly less money.
...
Disruptive strategy. A company pursues a disruptive strategy when it discovers and targets a population of overserved customers or nonconsumers with a new product or service offering that enables them to get a job done more cheaply, but not as well as competing solutions.
...
Discrete strategy. A company pursues a discrete strategy when it targets a population of “restricted” customers with a product that gets the job done worse, yet costs more. This strategy can work in situations where customers are legally, physically, emotionally, or otherwise restricted in how they can get a job done.
...
Sustaining strategy. A company pursues a sustaining strategy when it introduces a new product or service offering that gets the job done only slightly better and/or slightly cheaper."

quarta-feira, novembro 30, 2016

Intercom on Jobs-to-be-Done (parte II)

Parte I.

Continuamos com a série de sublinhados que retirei da leitura inicial de 'Intercom on Jobs-to-be-Done'.

"As Peter Drucker pointed out, the customer rarely buys what the business thinks it sells him. Sometimes the type of customer will define the job they need done. Sometimes the job itself is the only driving factor. It’s often hard to spot the difference.
...
Jobs-to-be-Done gives you a much better lens to think about your true competitors. It gives you the situational context that triggers people to use products.
...
When you’re blinded by thinking your competitors only exist in the exact same tool category you’re in, disruption or destruction will come from oblique angles.
...
So when you’re thinking about competitors, it’s best to ignore product categories and instead ask yourself who else is fighting for that same job.
...
The point is, customers don’t experience your product in a vacuum. They experience it alongside every other product, service, and idea fighting for their attention."

terça-feira, novembro 29, 2016

Intercom on Jobs-to-be-Done (parte I)

Uma série de sublinhados que retirei da leitura inicial de 'Intercom on Jobs-to-be-Done'.

"It’s easier to make things people want, than it is to make people want things. The challenge for any company is to understand what products are currently serving those needs, and improve upon that.
...
products don’t match people; they match problems.
.
We learned early the outcome a person wants is much more important than the person themselves.
...
By focusing on the job and the context of customers, you can develop and market products well-tailored to what customers are already trying to do.
...
Some products are better defined by the job they do than the customers they serve.
...
when you’re thinking about competitors, it’s best to ignore product categories and instead ask yourself who else is fighting for that same job."

Depois de ler Alan Klement isto já não é novidade. No entanto, é sempre bom mergulhar neste paradigma que ajuda a olhar para os desafios sob uma nova perspectiva.

quinta-feira, novembro 24, 2016

JTBD, tão bom (parte II)



6:16 - If there's no struggle there's no progress
6:50 - The struggle is the thing that opens your mind
7:26 - o sumo de 10 entrevistas a quem mudou, porque tinha uma "luta" interior, é mais precioso que mil inquéritos

segunda-feira, novembro 21, 2016

JTBD, tão bom!



Muito bom:

3:14 - Quando falo com pessoas falo com as que se mudaram. Eu não falo com os que não mudaram porque, honestamente, eles inventam.

3:34 - Quero falar com as pessoas que fizeram escolhas, que fizeram trade-offs. Todo o progresso assenta em trade-offs (profundo... faz pensar nos que querem progresso sem dor)

3:44 - A história da dinning table

5:50 - A história da basement

7:13 - E a história dos anúncios na página da necrologia (8:32)

sábado, novembro 19, 2016

Tudo é serviço

"Jobs theory essentially transforms products into services. [Moi ici: O mesmo que a Service Dominant Logic, ou tudo é serviço e o produto não passa de um avatar do serviço] "What matters is not the product attributes you rope together, but the experiences you enable to help your customers make the progress they want to make,"
...
jobs are discovered, not created.
...
Or consider things people don't want to do ("negative jobs" in the language of the book), such as taking a sick kid to the pediatrician on a busy workday."


Trechos retirados de "To Win Loyal Customers, You Need to Master 'Jobs Theory'"

Roubar a quem?

Esta semana ligaram-me para ser advogado do Diabo de uma ideia para uma startup.
.
Depois da conversa, voltei para as minhas leituras, descia o Marão num autocarro da Rodonorte, e já a chegar ao Porto li "Who are you stealing from?".
.
Ora aí está um bom teste para avaliar as possibilidades de sucesso de uma startup.
.
A quem é que a startup vai roubar clientes?
.
Se não for roubar clientes a ninguém ... vai ser mais difícil ter sucesso. Os potenciais clientes não estão habituados a pagar por um serviço alternativo. Assim, há que "educá-los" e "trabalhá-los" para que eventualmente se predisponham a equacionar o JBTD.