"focus on selling more effectively."

"Some prospects don’t understand how paying more can cost them less. [Moi ici: O truque do value based pricing, pensar no ciclo de vida que inclui o pós-compra. E se o comprador não chega lá, é tarefa do consultor de compra demonstrar as contas e abrir a mente do comprador para esse mundo] You are faced with a choice. You can either more effectively sell the value you create, or you can eliminate price as an objection. It’s easier to lower your price than it is to sell better. [Moi ici: Demasiado fácil e, quando não se investe na actividade comercial, quando não se trabalham os argumentos, quando não se focaliza nos clientes-alvo, ... é inevitável a erosão do desconto]
...
This is how sales organizations, salespeople, and whole industries are commoditized. If you have chosen low price as your strategy, then you need to compete by eliminating costs and providing the lowest price in all cases. But if you have decided to sell the additional value you create, the value that makes you different, then you need to focus on selling more effectively.
.
Reducing your price to increase your revenue is one way to go about increased sales. But that choice comes with reduced margins. You may indeed end up increasing your sales and selling more while building a far less profitable, and less valuable business. And you might also build a business that doesn’t make a difference in the end."

O que é que a sua empresa faz para vender melhor?

Trechos retirados de "Why You Cannot Match Your Competitor’s Price"

Hei! Eu só sou um anónimo engenheiro da província

Sim, eu só sou um anónimo da província.
.
Posso torcer o nariz ao que dizem ser o conteúdo do Plano Estratégico da PT, aqui e aqui, mas quem sou eu?
.
Interessante recuperar este texto de 2005, "Zeitgeist Leadership":

"A leader’s long-term success isn’t derived from sheer force of personality or breadth and depth of skill. Without an ability to read and adapt to changing business conditions, personality and skill are but temporal strengths. An understanding of the zeitgeist and its implications has played a critical but unheralded role in some of the greatest business victories of all time."

E conjugá-lo com este outro de Novembro de 2014, "How the three rules drive telecom firms' performance":

"The history of the telecom industry ... is important because it created a set of deeply ingrained institutional beliefs and behaviors that were not appropriate in the context of new competitive realities. As a result, companies struggled, and some made poor decisions about how to approach new business realities.
...
Research conducted across industries, described in "The Three Rules: How Exceptional Companies Think", [Moi ici: Livro comentado aqui no blogue] shows that the most successful enterprises are those that continually search for and find ways to create new value - that is, value that is not price-driven - and in the process, pursue growth. Examining the study’s most consistently successful businesses, the researchers distilled three rules that drive long-term superior performance . The three rules are:
.
1) Better before cheaper: Don’t compete on price; compete on value.
.
2) Revenue before cost: Drive profitability with higher volume and price, not lower cost.
.
3) There are no other rules: Do whatever you have to in order to remain aligned with the first two rules."

E, então, o plano estratégico da PT concentra-se na redução de custos? OK, está percebido!

O conselho!

Mais um excelente trecho retirado de "The Three Rules":

"The prevalence of revenue-driven profitability among exceptional companies is perhaps most significant for what it says about how best to use ROA as a guide to strategie action.
.
As we explored briefly in chapter 1, since ROA is a ratio, there is no mathematieal difference when ROA is inereased by adjusting any of its constituent elements. Raise price or volume, reduce costs or assets ... the arithmetic cannot tell the difference. (Moi ici: Advinhem qual a interpretação dos teóricos da tríade, desconhecedores da relações amorosas e crentes monoteístas no Excel)
.
But in practice there seems to he a very real difference. Miracle Workers are not wastrels, but they do not rely ou cost leadership to drive their performance. Both in our population of exceptional companies and in our sample, Miracle Worker status is a consequence of gross margin advantage driven hy higher price or volume—and as often as not enabled by higher costs and frequently assets. ln other words, exceptional profitability demands, beyond a point, making trade-offs, accepting higher costs as the price of being truly exceptional. Driving profitability from merely good to truly great by reducing either costs or assets is not something we see, as an entirely empirical matter, to be the most likely route to Miracle Worker performance."

Um conselho sempre presente neste blogue.
.
Li este trecho a caminhar para casa, depois de deixar o carro na revisão e, pensei nas "guerras" que às vezes é preciso ter nas empresas, para conseguir passar esta mensagem... a competição pelo custo está tão entranhada... e eu não tenho o tempo de antena da tríade, sempre a martelarem a mensagem da competição pelo custo... e como sublinhei há dias, com base em Gary Klein, uma mentira muitas vezes repetida passa a ser a verdade oficial, mesmo perante evidências que sustentam o contrário... é um combate desigual.

I told you so

"when your customers are yelling for price cuts, you can drop prices and then squeeze your company elsewhere to try to preserve profitability, or you can see through their complaints on price to the more difficult truth that maybe you have gotten lazy or lost focus or that the competition has upped its game and you no longer provide the superior value you once did. Addressing that problem means taking on the challenge of increasing and perhaps even changing the value you provide; it could mean changing any or all of your technologies, processes, markets, or customers. Both courses of action - cutting price or increasing value - can be difficult to pursue successfully, and each of them can make equally good sense.
.
It is in just these circumstances that better before cheaper proves its worth. Faced with a choice between two difficult, similarly plausible, but mutually exclusive solutions to what can be an existential challenge, the best you can do is play the odds. Our research suggests strongly that the most profitable course of action is to devote your resources to tackling the hard problem of creating anew the non-price value your customers will pay for, not the hard problem of how to remain profitable at lower prices. "

Apetece dizer "I told you so!"
.
Apostar no numerador, apostar na eficácia, apostar na subida na escala de valor... apostar no Evangelho do Valor!!!
.
Trechos retirados de "The Three Rules" de Michael Raynor e Mumtaz Ahmed