Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta bcg. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta bcg. Mostrar todas as mensagens

terça-feira, fevereiro 08, 2011

Pergunta ingénua do dia (parte III)

Continuado daqui.
.
O Pedro Soares teve a amabilidade de me enviar um relatório do BCG intitulado "The Coming Infrastructure Crisis - Is Your Supply Chain Ready?" (peca apenas por se basear sobretudo em projecções lineares do passado projectadas no futuro)
.
Alguns títulos de capítulos:

  • "Container Port Capacity Is Not Keeping Up with Long-Term Demand
  • Land Transport Networks Are Becoming Saturated
  • Airports and Airways Are Also Under Pressure"
...
"The bottom line is that logistics costs will increase significantly - and companies must rethink and redesign their supply chains or become victims. ... Managers obsessed with fuel costs should also factor in congestion costs, which not only increase the time it takes to move goods but also drive up all operating costs per ton handled.
...
The most significant recent change to the supply chains of many companies took place in the 1980s and 1990s, as companies began sourcing from China and other Asian countries. These changes caused supply chains to be more geographically dispersed and complicated as companies sought to achieve the lowest landed-product costs through a combination of low-cost sourcing and world-scale manufacturing facilities. In the pursuit of lower costs, however, many companies saddled themselves with long and sometimes unreliable supply chains that were far harder to manage.
.
As infrastructure demand outstrips capacity, companies that built their supply chains over the last 40 years and that ship their goods by some combination of sea, land (rail and road), and air will be profoundly affected.
...
(Moi ici: Como lidar com esta situação? Uma das opções propostas pelo BCG é a redução da variabilidade)
.
"Generally speaking, the longer your supply chain, the greater is the risk of variability
...
Consider sourcing some products closer to home. ... In a growing number of situations, this "near" sourcing results in lower costs at the point of sale. Other companies are moving away from high-volume, world-scale plants that make just a few broadly distributed products, and instead are building smaller plants that make a wider range of products for local markets. Increases in unit production costs are often more than offset by lower logistics costs, faster replenishment cycles, and fewer stockouts and overstocks."
.
E o presidente da CIP continua a pensar no porto de Sines!!!
.
Quando devia estar a fomentar estudos internos sobre como é que as empresas portuguesas podem aproveitar esta revolução na logística.

sexta-feira, novembro 26, 2010

Investir em 'cães rafeiros'

Voltando ao livro "The Lords of Strategy" e a uns trechos retirados acerca da história da BCG de Bruce Henderson:
.
"On their journey, Henderson and his compadres picked up two conclusions central to the revolution:
.
First, that in thinking about strategy, one should focus on cash - how much did a business generate, how much consume - rather than on earning reported for accounting purposes. Second, that for most companies, leverage was a good thing. Or as Henderson put it in a 1972 Perspectives essay, "Use more debt than your competition or get out of the business."
.
Num outro ensaio publicado num Perspectives, também de 1972:
.
"A majority of most companies' products are such snares, he concluded, in that "they will absorb more money forever than they will generate.""
.
Pegando na matriz criada pela BCG:
Para os políticos portugueses, de todos os partidos, todo o dinheiro que o Estado gasta e rotula de investimento é bem gasto... pois!
.
E se esse dinheiro, pedido emprestado, é utilizado para aplicar em projectos com baixa rentabilidade, em cães rafeiros?
.
"they will absorb more money forever than they will generate"
.
Um exemplo do dia:
.

Como os projectos "cão rafeiro" não têm viabilidade de avançar com a iniciativa privada, são os candidatos mais adequados para impingir aos decisores públicos, que não usam o seu dinheiro nem têm de pagar o empréstimo... isso fica para os trouxas que os elegeram.
.
E o TGV? E a OTA, e...