Quando se esquece a razão de ser...

Um excelente artigo, "Have America's industrial giants forgotten what they are for?"

O artigo termina assim:

"Well-established companies should ask themselves a simple question, says McGrath: "Who in the company is in the business of looking after its future?

"In most of the companies I work with, it's in between the head of innovation, with no power, and the C-suite, where it isn't taken really seriously. And I think that's a problem.""

Alguns trechos do artigo:

"Ortberg also went to the heart of what many believe is the reason Boeing, once an icon of US manufacturing pride and engineering prowess, had lost its way. "We... need to focus our resources on performing and innovating in the areas that are core to who we are," he wrote.

...

Boeing "abandoned its larger reason for being — the values and sense of purpose that had fuelled the firm's success throughout the 20th century".

...

Maximising one measure of success - and ignoring information not related to that metric - distracts companies from innovation and better long-term staff relations, he adds. [Moi ici: Interessante, isto tem tudo a ver com a experiência do gorila]

...

Size is one potential threat to a coherent industrial culture.

...

"Companies develop, they pick up a lot of 'stuff' — rules that don't make any sense, a lot of bureaucracy," she adds. "Unless you have companies that bring these things into balance, the entropy of just being a large company takes over."

[Moi ici: O artigo volta ao velho exemplo da Kodak e culpa Wall street pela pressão exercida que impediu a empresa de dar o salto para o mundo digital porque estava focada em manter o negócio do filme com elevadas margens. No entanto, as empresas que não estão em bolsa também sofrem esta pressão para apostar no negócio que está a dar em detrimento do que poderá vir a dar num futuro incerto, têm de pagar salários, têm de pagar impostos, têm de ...] "a Kodak moment" is now more likely to be used to describe a failure to spot an approaching technological change than a memorable scene worth photographing.

But Kodak had been exploring digital imaging since the 1970s. It was Wall Street that pressured the company to continue milking its high-margin analog film business, even as it became clear that consumers would inevitably switch to digital."

Pensam que o problema só existe com as empresas grandes? Recordo de Maio de 2023:

"Então com empresas familiares é muitas vezes doloroso ... A única pessoa que pode dedicar tempo a isto está a conduzir um empilhador para arrumar paletes, ou está a substituir um operário especializado que está de baixa... e quem pensa no futuro da empresa? Quem encara de frente o monstro da erosão competitiva?"  

Voltando ao artigo, enquanto o lia várias vezes fui recordado do que aqui tenho escrito ao longo das décadas sobre a doença anglo-saxónica. Por exemplo neste postal de Março de 2020 faço uma resenha sobre o tema.