.
Assim, tenho a ideia, eu e alguns grupos políticos de esquerda, que quando uma empresa anuncia despedimentos e reestruturações as suas cotações sobem.
.
Não me interpretem mal, a maior parte das vezes associo esses despedimentos e reestruturações a uma actuação à la Lanchester, de gente que não percebendo as oportunidades do mercado, pois falta-lhes conhecimento e relações amorosas com clientes, produtos e fornecedores, só vê uma alternativa, defender o que já tem.
.
Uma coisa é a nossa percepção da realidade, outra é a realidade:
.
"Restructuring seldom results in fundamental improvement in the business. At best it buys time. One study of 16 large U.S. companies with at least three years of restructuring experience found that although restructuring usually did improve a firm's share price, the improvement was almost always temporary. Three years into restructuring, the share prices of the companies surveyed were, on average, lagging even farther behind index growth rates than they had been when the restructuring began. The study concluded that a savvy investor should look at a restructuring announcement as a signal to sell rather than buy.' Downsizing belatedly attempts to correct the mistakes of the past; it is not about creating the markets of the future. (Moi ici: Drucker tinha aquela tirada fantástica, não se concentrem nos problemas mas nas oportunidades) The simple point is that getting smaller is not enough. Downsizing, the equivalent of corporate anorexia, can make a company thinner; it doesn't necessarily make it healthier.(Moi ici: até tremo com a coincidência de opiniões... uso tantas vezes esta imagem, correr, correr, correr, e ganhar negócios com margens cada vez mais apertadas até morrer anoréctico... hei-de procurar esta palavra neste blogue.)
Any company that is better at denominator management than numerator management-any company that doesn't have a track record of ambitious, profitable, organic growth-shouldn't expect Wall Street to cut it much slack. What Wall Street says to such companies is, "Go ahead, squeeze the lemon, get the inefficiencies out, but give us the juice (i.e., the dividends). We'll take that juice and give it to companies that are better at making lemonade." The financial community knows that a management team that is good at denominator reduction may not be good at numerator growth." (Moi ici: normalmente não é, porque ao concentrar-se na redução de custos não lhe sobra tempo de qualidade para ter atenção e trabalhar o aproveitamento das oportunidades)
Any company that is better at denominator management than numerator management-any company that doesn't have a track record of ambitious, profitable, organic growth-shouldn't expect Wall Street to cut it much slack. What Wall Street says to such companies is, "Go ahead, squeeze the lemon, get the inefficiencies out, but give us the juice (i.e., the dividends). We'll take that juice and give it to companies that are better at making lemonade." The financial community knows that a management team that is good at denominator reduction may not be good at numerator growth." (Moi ici: normalmente não é, porque ao concentrar-se na redução de custos não lhe sobra tempo de qualidade para ter atenção e trabalhar o aproveitamento das oportunidades)
.
Trecho retirado de "Competing for the Future" de Gary Hamel e C. K. Prahalad.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário