Pensamento fossilizado II

O @pauloperes chamou-me a atenção para este artigo que Steve Denning escreveu há cerca de um ano "Efficiency At Any Cost: Economics Made Wrong"
.
No artigo, Denning comenta um texto de Barry Schwartz, “Economics Made Easy”, que não passa de uma ode à eficiência, típico da tríade.

"Worshipping efficiency at any cost is not only heartless: it’s wrong.
.
What the article is reciting is the mantra that pervaded 20th Century economics and management. It goes way back to Frederick Winslow Taylor’s Principles of Scientific Management (1911) which assumed that the efficiency, i.e. cutting costs and saving money, is the be-all and end-all of an organization.
.
What the NYT article misses is that improved efficiency by cutting costs is only one of three ways in which a society’s standard of living can improve. There are two other important routes:

• Adding more value to the customer

• Delivering value sooner

The NYT article thus misses Peter Drucker’s foundational insight of 1973: “The only valid purpose of a firm is to create a customer.” A firm does this by offering value to customers, by providing more of it, providing it at lower value and delivering it sooner. Cost-cutting is only one of three dimensions.
...
The idea that improving efficiency by lowering costs is the sole goal of a firm became pervasive in the 20th Century, in part because big firms were hierarchical bureaucracies and cutting costs is all that bureaucracies are good for.
.
Bureaucracies are not good at continuous innovation and consistently delivering more value to customers. Nor are bureaucracies good at delivering value sooner"

 Este ano, em Fevereiro, já tinha comentado o artigo de Schwartz em "Pensamento fossilizado". É este pensamento fossilizado que domina o mainstream do pensamento económico nas universidades, nas empresas, nos media e nas políticas públicas.