Entimema

Há dias descobri uma palavra, entimema, para algo que me aborrece quando a pratico, ou outros a praticam. 

Recordo daqui:

"Muitas vezes tomamos decisões e clarificamos e somos claros sobre o que decidimos, mas quase sempre esquecemos de enunciar, de tornar claro e transparente aquilo a que renunciamos, e quais são os pressupostos e implicações das nossas decisões.

Por exemplo, vejo muitas empresas entusiasmadas com a aplicação das metodologias lean desenvolvidas na Toyota, mas poucas sabem que o Toyota Production System parte do pressuposto que o planeamento da produção está congelado 8 semanas para a frente?"

Na Wikipedia, sobre entimema pode ler-se:

"The first type of enthymeme is a truncated syllogism, or a syllogism with an unstated premise.

Here is an example of an enthymeme derived from a syllogism through truncation (shortening) of the syllogism:

"Socrates is mortal because he's human."

The complete formal syllogism would be the classic:

All humans are mortal. (major premise – unstated)

Socrates is human. (minor premise – stated)

Therefore, Socrates is mortal. (conclusion – stated)

While syllogisms lay out all of their premises and conclusion explicitly, these kinds of enthymemes keep at least one of the premises or the conclusion unstated."

Por que escrevo sobre isto? Por causa deste artigo de Roger Martin, "Segmentation & Strategy" onde se pode ler:

"Segments aren’t homogeneous. It isn’t as simple as ‘these are our customers’ and ‘those are yours.’ Instead, there are many shades. Your choices make your offering perfect for someone — portrayed as the black dot in both sides of the illustration above. The circle on the left is a view of the segment from above with the two axes connoting segmentation variables, and the right is a view from the side with the vertical axis connoting value in excess of the best competitive alternative — I think of it as an upside-down bowl sitting on a counter top. For the dot customer, its desires match perfectly with your offering. Because of that perfect match, that customer is at the very center of the circle on the left and at the very peak of the curve on the right.

Radiating out from that perfect customer are customers who value your offering ever less — they are farther from the center of the circle on the left and are farther down the upside-down bowl on the left. If a customer is located at the very edge of the circle on the left, it is indifferent between your offer and that of a competitor (or competitors). And they will be at the lip of the bowl on the right — for them, there is no value advantage of your offer over that of competition. Think about it in terms of heat. Customers in the center are intensely hot about your offer and as you radiate from the cetnter, they get ever cooler about your offer until they are completely indifferent. So, your market is defined by the size of the customer population within the circumference of your circle/to the lip of your bowl.

The bigger the circle/bowl, the more valuable your strategy. [Moi ici: É aqui que a palavra entimema começa a fazer-se sentir]

...

The more successful and valuable offerings have a shallow and lengthy drop-off from the perfect customer. The less valuable — even though highly valuable to the customers within their tiny circle — have a steep drop-off.

The steepness of the drop-off is what makes the difference between successful and unsuccessful entrepreneurs. Many unsuccessful entrepreneurs design an offering that is extremely valuable to the perfect customer — typically themselves — but the drop-off is so steep that their idea collapses, not because it didn’t create value, but because the steepness of the drop-off makes it impossible to make the economics work. Successful entrepreneurs design their offering in a way that appeals to a much broader audience.  [Moi ici: Quem são os clientes-alvo para o Roger Martin? PMEs? Não! As empresas com que Roger Martin trabalha são empresas grandes, empresas que precisam de volume e que não podem ser muito focadas num determinado tipo de cliente. Para uma PME a situação é completamente oposta]

The implication is that you need to design for your perfect customer but equally think carefully about the decline curve. If you obsess about the perfect customer and not about the shape of the value decline curve, you will be out of business." [Moi ici: Para PMEs o que interessa é a capacidade de gerar paixão assimétrica, a capacidade de falar para uma tribo de sangue. Sem isso, boa sorte a tentar subir na escala de valor e a conseguir aumentar preços para poder competir por recursos]