Mongo, Mongo e Mongo

Primeiro, o modelo:

"This approach to business is sometimes called the “Hollywood model.” A project is identified; a team is assembled; it works together for precisely as long as is needed to complete the task; then the team disbands. This short-term, project-based business structure is an alternative to the corporate model, in which capital is spent up front to build a business, which then hires workers for long-term, open-ended jobs that can last for years, even a lifetime. It’s also distinct from the Uber-style “gig economy,” which is designed to take care of extremely short-term tasks, manageable by one person, typically in less than a day.
.
With the Hollywood model, ad hoc teams carry out projects that are large and complex, requiring many different people with complementary skills. The Hollywood model is now used to build bridges, design apps or start restaurants. Many cosmetics companies assemble a temporary team of aestheticians and technical experts to develop new products,"

Porquê a transição para este modelo?
.
Por causa de ... Mongo!!!

"Our economy is in the midst of a grand shift toward the Hollywood model. More of us will see our working lives structured around short-term, project-based teams rather than long-term, open-ended jobs. There are many reasons this change is happening right now, but perhaps the best way to understand it is that we have reached the end of a hundred-year fluke, an odd moment in economic history that was dominated by big businesses offering essentially identical products. Competition came largely by focusing on the cost side, through making production cheaper and more efficient; [Moi ici: Estou inchado como um perú!!! Leu isto primeiro neste blogue há vários anos!!! Desde o Vieira da Silva ao Gaspar, desde o Ferraz da Costa ao Ferreira do Amaral, ainda andam atrás dos cêntimos da melhoria da produtividade baseada no denominador] this process required businesses to invest tremendous amounts in physical capital — machines and factories — and then to populate those factories with workers who performed routine activities."

Quem ganha?

"Obviously this is good news for management and the owners of capital. But as I saw on set, it’s a surprisingly good system for many workers too, in particular those with highly sought-after skills.
...
The Hollywood system offers another advantage for workers: Every weekend’s box-office results provide new information about which skills in their field are valuable.
...
This continual signaling [Moi ici: Gosto particularmente deste ponto] can be upsetting, of course; every year, some workers in the system learn that they have no marketable skills. But on the whole, it is surely kinder than the factory system, in which workers are able to assess their market value only occasionally: when they first start working, when they switch jobs, when they ask for a raise or — worst of all — when they are fired, often en masse."

Trechos retirados de "What Hollywood Can Teach Us About the Future of Work"