Os pré-socráticos e o seu papel

Em Acerca da realidade escrevo sobre a minha professora de Filosofia do 10º ano, pessoa que caricaturava os filósofos pré-socráticos. É tão fácil caricaturar os filósofos pré-socráticos e obter "aplausos" de putos ignorantes.

Teria sido tão bom a senhora ter preparado melhor a lição, ou não ter sido formada durante a orgia revolucionária, e ter-se focado no papel que eles tiveram para nos raptar do mundo dos mitos. John Vervaeke a partir do minuto 22 explica o papel desses filósofos com o exemplo de Thales:

BTW, este podcast é tão bom:

que me lancei na tarefa de ouvir a série de Vervaeke.

Acerca da realidade

A minha professora de Filosofia do 10º ano de escolaridade era uma daquelas criaturas que acha que se pode interessar os alunos pela Filosofia fazendo pouco, caricaturando as ideias dos filósofos.
.
Tanto caricaturava os gregos por acharem que tudo era terra, fogo, água e ar como, por exemplo, o bispo Berkeley e o seu imaterialismo.
.
Graças a Deus que Guedes Miranda apareceu no meu caminho para me revelar a beleza da Filosofia e, por exemplo, a importância filosófica da Física Quântica.
.
Por isso, "The Case Against Reality" é uma bela viagem a esse tempo de descoberta:

"The world presented to us by our perceptions is nothing like reality. What’s more, he says, we have evolution itself to thank for this magnificent illusion, as it maximizes evolutionary fitness by driving truth to extinction.
...
The central lesson of quantum physics is clear: There are no public objects sitting out there in some preexisting space. As the physicist John Wheeler put it, “Useful as it is under ordinary circumstances to say that the world exists ‘out there’ independent of us, that view can no longer be upheld.”
...
According to evolution by natural selection, an organism that sees reality as it is will never be more fit than an organism of equal complexity that sees none of reality but is just tuned to fitness. Never.
...
Objective reality is just conscious agents, just points of view." 

A propósito de "an organism that sees reality as it is will never be more fit than an organism of equal complexity that sees none of reality but is just tuned to fitness" lembrei-me disto:

What Strategists Can Learn from Sartre

Na revista strategy+business encontrei este artigo "What Strategists Can Learn from Sartre" de James Ogilvy. Estes trechos sintetizam bem a realidade que vivemos:



"The old production economy was predictable because it operated in the realm of necessity; it produced goods and services people needed, and those were relatively stable. The new economy plays in the realm of freedom; it produces goods and services for a customer who is not bound by needs. The old economy called for strategies built by engineers who could calculate according to necessary laws. The new economy calls for strategies created by existentialists who understand freedom. Most important of all, the old economy operated at a regular pace, in the clockwork time of industrial production. The new economy lurches forward and backward, in some new kind of time that was anticipated, once again, by the existential philosophers."



...



"In Silicon Valley, there’s a saying: “Who needs a futurist to tell us about the future? We’re building it!” This is pure existentialism. The point isn’t so much that the pace of change is increasing — Alvin Toffler’s argument in Future Shock (Amereon Ltd., 1970). Instead it’s calling into question who’s in charge — God, haphazard fate, or human invention? The existentialists have something to tell us about taking charge of our own future."



...



"Suddenly, humanity had a future — in the sense in which existentialists think of the future, as an open-ended, indeterminate field of untried possibilities. For existentialists, existence precedes essence. It’s not that no one or nothing has an essence. It’s just that essence, for free human beings, anyway, is achieved rather than prescribed. You become the results of the decisions you make. You don’t find yourself, as those suffering “identity crises” try to do. You make yourself by making decisions. You’re not just the result of the genes you inherited or the circumstances of your birth. Of course genes and family background make a difference, but what you choose to do with them is subject to existential freedom"



Para mim isto é poesia, música celestial (sem ironia), só tenho pena que tão poucos se apercebam da enormidade deste tipo de pensamento. Somos nós que construímos o futuro, o futuro não devia ser achado, não devia ser aguardado, não devia ser entregue.



"Five Principles of Existential Strategy
Finitude. You can’t be all things to all people. If you’re not saying “no” to some possibilities, then you’re not acting strategically.
Being-Toward-Death. No one is too big to fail, to die, to go bankrupt. Gliding on momentum can lead to a crash.
Care. Define your interests more precisely than ROI or return to shareholders. If you don’t know where you stand, you’ll fall for anything.
Thrownness. You have a past; you have experiences and core competencies. Know them, use them, and don’t forget them.
Authenticity. Don’t be bound by your past. Feel free to reinvent yourself and your company for an uncertain future"