Evitar o crescer por crescer

Mais um percurso de jogging, mais um capítulo de "The Knack - How Street-Smart Entrepreneurs Learn to Handle Whatever Comes Up" de Norm Brodsky e Bo Burlingham, desta vez o 11º com o título "The Decision to Grow":
.
"My point is that growth is a matter of choice. You don't have to grow at all if you don't want to. (Moi ici: Crescer por crescer pode ser o pior que acontece a uma empresa) You certainly don't have to strive to get as big as possible as fast as possible. If that's what you want, more power to you, but there's no rule of business that says you must. I can think of many situations in which smaller companies actually have a distinct advantage over larger ones. In fact, I've often found that it's easier to compete against a big company than against a well-run small company.
...
We beat the giants on service. We beat them on flexibility. We beat them on location and price. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of customers (other than national accounts) that we've ever lost to the giants ...
I don't mean any disrespect toward our large competitors.
...
can't offer what we have: a highly focused, tightly knit, family-oriented small business with owners who are on the scene and actively involved. We play that advantage for all it's worth. All prospective customers visit our main warehouse and meet with me personally. I tell them, "Anytime you have a problem, you can just call me."
...
The message is one of accessibility and personal service, and we constantly look for ways to reinforce it."(Moi ici: Uma outra forma de dizer, batota!!)
...
So our size has been an advantage, especially in going after the small to medium accounts, which are the bread and butter of our industry. Our primary competition for them used to come not from the giants but from the other regional specialists, whose owners ran their businesses much as I ran mine. And that entrepreneurial edge is precisely what two of them lost when they were acquired by large companies."
.
Pessoalmente valorizo esta postura, crescer devagar. Associar qualidade de vida dos empresários, a correr detrás para a frente, a crescimento sustentado. Sobretudo, evitar o crescer por crescer.

Qual a dimensão dos seus clientes? Quem são os clientes-alvo?

Comecei a ouvir, durante o jogging, o livro "The Knack" porque tinha como co-author Bo Burlingham, autor que escreve sobre PMEs americanas que se preocupam em fazer a diferença e não estão numa corrida desenfreada para crescerem..
.
E tem sido uma excelente surpresa, capítulo atrás de capítulo, mensagens poderosas em sintonia com a pregação feita neste blogue. Por exemplo, acerca do capítulo VIII, um capítulo particularmente rico:
.
"While I completely agree with the old saying that “nothing happens without a sale,” it does not follow that all sales are equal. Some sales are much better than others — a concept that salespeople often have a hard time dealing with. (Moi ici: Esta verdade é tão desconhecida e tão importante... meu Deus!!!) That’s partly because they have a sales mentality. They’ve been conditioned to think that any sale is  a good sale, and the larger the volume, the better. In fact, the size of the sale is a lot less important than the amount of gross profi t you’re going to earn on it. Too many low-margin sales can drive you out of business.
.
By the same token, many entrepreneurs think that they should focus on signing up big customers.
.
In the long run, he’d be much better off with a lot of small customers than with one or two big ones.
Small customers are the backbone of a solid, stable, profitable business — especially a service business.
...
Not that there’s anything wrong with having big customers. Sooner or later, most of us need them to grow. But you should never look down on your small customers or take them for granted. The more you have, the happier you’ll be. Why? I can give you three reasons.
First, you get better gross margins with small customers because they pay more for your services. (Moi ici: E os comerciais conhecem as margens dos artigos que vendem? E as empresas conhecem as margens dos artigos que produzem?) They have no choice. They simply don’t have the negotiating power of large customers. As a result, you can charge small customers the top price.
...
Second, small customers bring stability to a business. If you treat small customers right, they’ll stay with you forever. That’s partly because they’re loyal, and partly because— like most of us—they tend to resist change. It’s also true, however, that they’re much less likely than big customers to be lured away by competitors, if only because most companies don’t seek out small customers.
...
Third, a broad base of small customers makes your business less vulnerable to the loss of any single customer. That’s why—when you apply for a loan—a bank will ask you to list all of your customers that account for more than 10 percent of your sales, as well as the percentage of sales that each one represents. If you do more than 30 of sales with any single customer, you’re in trouble."
.
Continua.

They are a treasure

Um último recorte do livro "Small Giants" de Bo Burlingham, um sobre o criador da revista Inc., Bernard A. Goldhirsh:

.

"Although it’s hard to imagine now, there was a time when it was not considered a compliment to be called “entrepreneurial.” Back in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, entrepreneurs were generally looked upon as shifty characters with little or no redeeming social value. The media ignored them, academia deplored them, and their companies got no more respect than they did. When people talked about business, they were referring to large, well-established, publicly traded companies.

Smaller, private companies were regarded as fringe elements, and therefore unimportant by definition.

...

Bernie frequently talked about an aspect of entrepreneurship that other people sometimes overlooked - the intensely creative, almost artistic, part of the process. His thoughts on the subject grew partly out of an experience he’d had as an undergraduate at MIT, when he had taken a semester off to work for Dr. Edwin Land at Polaroid. There he had joined a small group of people charged with inventing the cameras of the future.

.

“Dr. Land [was] like a hero to me,” he recalled. “Here was this fast-growing company, creating all kinds of jobs, created by this one man with an idea. And I thought, ‘This is so fantastic, that one person can do so much in terms of creating a business, creating an enterprise, creating jobs, increasing the tax base. So much good comes out of this one person and his idea and his willingness to go ahead and start a business.’”

.

To be sure, the phenomenon was hardly limited to Dr. Land. Entrepreneurship, Bernie realized, was the means by which an economy continually renewed itself. Without it, a country would lose

its vitality, its energy, and become impoverished—just as a culture would become impoverished without the ongoing creation of art. “I kept thinking that the entrepreneur is like an artist, only business is the means of his expression….” he said. “He creates [a business] from nothing, just a blank canvas. It’s amazing. Somebody goes into a garage, has nothing but an idea, and out of the garage comes a company, a living company. It’s so special what they do. They are a treasure""

Small Giants

Em Setembro passado, no Twitter, Tom Peters recomendou 2 livros:

• "Retail Superstars: Inside the 25 Best Independent Stores in America" de George Whalin; e
• "Small Giants: Companies That Choose to Be Great Instead of Big" de Bo Burlingham
  

Já os tenho comigo há algum tempo. Ontem comecei a ler o "Small Giants" e está a ser um agradável complemento de "Smart Growth" de Edward Hess:

.

"For a conventional business, however, the growth is the goal, and the control is what you need to keep it in hand. With the companies we’re looking at, creating opportunities for employees and opening up new possibilities for the business are the goals. Growth is a natural by-product of the company’s success in pursuing its central purpose and reason for being, whatever that may be.
...
So we sat down and did a lot of soul-searching.
We asked what we did well, what kind of work did we get a better return on, what did we need to improve. And then we changed everything.”
...
“Instead of trying to do it all, we wanted to be the best at a few things. We physically gave up our licenses in other states so we couldn’t work there, and we went from taking every job to questioning every job.” That meant getting rid of customers, including some who’d been with the company for a long time. The team spent hours analyzing the customer base, noting which jobs were more profitable, discussing which niches Butler should be in and which clients played best to its skill set, projecting how economic trends would affect different industries, and so on. Then came the cuts. “We went from twenty-five clients to ten clients,” Butler said. “Mainly we fired the bad ones, including our biggest client”—a giant financial services company —“that accounted for 50 percent of the value of our jobs. The people they had on our projects were demeaning to us. They’d lie and make us look like fools. We told them we didn’t want to work with them anymore.”"
.
Por todo o lado a mensagem: concentração, concentração, concentração!!!