A culpa não é da ferramenta é de quem a usa inadequadamente

Quando uma empresa aposta na eficiência para ter sucesso, e pode, os resultados começam a ver-se muito mais rapidamente do que quando a aposta passa pela inovação, moda, marca, serviço à medida.
.
Muitas empresas apostam na eficiência quando não o devem fazer. E empatam recursos preciosos e escassos em actividades internas, viradas para dentro, perdendo a janelas de oportunidades que se encontram no exterior.

"In fact, of 58 large companies that have announced Six Sigma programs, 91 percent have trailed the S&P 500 since, according to an analysis by Charles Holland of consulting firm Qualpro (which espouses a competing quality-improvement process).
One of the chief problems of Six Sigma, say Holland and other critics, is that it is narrowly designed to fix an existing process, allowing little room for new ideas or an entirely different approach. All that talent - all those best and brightest - were devoted to, say, driving defects down to 3.4 per million and not on coming up with new products or disruptive technologies."

A culpa não é da ferramenta é de quem a usa inadequadamente. E é isto que critico no mundo da Qualidade, a promoção de certas ferramentas, independentemente da sua coerência com a orientação estratégica das empresas.
.
Trecho retirado de "New rule: Look out, not in."
.
Recordar "Tempo de repensar a melhoria contínua"

Locus de controlo

Sábias palavras estas:

"periodic slowdowns are inevitable, even if the company is fundamentally solid. That doesn't mean that CEOs (old or new), and other managers, can't do anything to slow the decline or reverse it more quickly. Taking action, however, requires an understanding of the three forces that always drag high-flying companies back to earth.
.
The first is the law of large numbers.
...
A company's growth is also inhibited by market maturity.
...
The third reason that growth slows down is psychological self-protection.
...
Taken together, these natural forces almost always damp down growth, which is why we shouldn't be surprised when successful companies hit periodic speed bumps. The challenge of course is what to do about it. Here are two suggestions that managers at all levels can consider:
.
Regularly re-examine your business model. In the face of the forces described above, most business models eventually get stale and need to be either abandoned or refreshed. (Moi ici: Por isto é que este tipo de mensagem é tóxica, afasta as empresas desta reflexão sobre o ajuste entre a oferta e o mercado. O locus de controlo tem de estar no interior... e volto a Gonzales e à sua mensagem em "Deep Survival") So periodically take a look at what you do, and how you do it — and ask yourself if it still makes sense. Could someone else provide this product or service differently? Do our customers have other choices or have their needs changed? In other words don't limit your innovation and research to the development of new products and services, but also focus on the possibility of new business models.
...
Think about getting smaller in order to get bigger. A second way to cope is to periodically do some pruning. Like trees that get too spindly, organizations also grow unnecessary branches that reduce the health of the overall enterprise. (Moi ici: Sempre que vejo um SUV da Volvo, ou um Polo da BMW penso em des-foco) These need to be cut back in order to allow new shoots to have the resources to flourish. To do so, ask yourself whether some of your products or services may not be producing sufficient returns; or whether you would be better off without some of your customers. These are tough questions that often provoke strong emotional responses. But taking action on them can liberate you and your resources to focus on new opportunities and will lead to more growth in the long term."

Trechos retirados de "Why Successful Companies Stop Growing"

Tempo de repensar a melhoria contínua

Mais uma vez o anónimo engenheiro de província... eu bem vos disse:

• Jun 2007 - "Não culpem a caneta quando a culpa é de quem escreve"
• Mar 2008 - "O perigo da cristalização"
• Fev 2009 - "Não culpem a caneta quando a culpa é de quem escreve"
• Set 2010 - "Seis Sigma e Inovação. Para mim não cola"
• Out 2011 - "Não culpem a caneta quando a culpa é de quem escreve"

Atentem neste texto de Ron Ashkenas "It's Time to Rethink Continuous Improvement":

"Looking beyond Japan, iconic six sigma companies in the United States, such as Motorola and GE, have struggled in recent years to be innovation leaders. 3M, which invested heavily in continuous improvement, had to loosen its sigma methodology in order to increase the flow of innovation. As innovation thinker Vijay Govindarajan says, "The more you hardwire a company on total quality management, [the more] it is going to hurt breakthrough innovation. The mindset that is needed, the capabilities that are needed, the metrics that are needed, the whole culture that is needed for discontinuous innovation, are fundamentally different.""

E recordar o que o anónimo engenheiro de província escreveu lá em cima em "O perigo da cristalização"