terça-feira, abril 23, 2013

Reduzir a taxa de insucesso das startups (parte II)

Parte I.
.
Primeiro recordar este postal recente "Empreendedorismo e planos de negócio... um retrato da superficialidade". Depois, voltar ao texto de Steve Blank:
"But recently an important countervailing force has emerged, one that can make the process of starting a company less risky. It’s a methodology called the “lean start-up,” and it favors experimentation over elaborate planning, customer feedback over intuition, and iterative design over traditional “big design up front” development.
...
The Fallacy of the Perfect Business Plan.
According to conventional wisdom, the first thing every founder must do is create a business plan -a static document that describes the size of an opportunity, the problem to be solved, and the solution that the new venture will provide. Typically it includes a five-year forecast for income, profits, and cash flow. A business plan is essentially a research exercise written in isolation at a desk before an entrepreneur has even begun to build a product. The assumption is that it’s possible to figure out most of the unknowns of a business in advance, before you raise money and actually execute the idea.
.
Once an entrepreneur with a convincing business plan obtains money from investors, he or she begins developing the product in a similarly insular fashion.
...
 After decades of watching thousands of start-ups follow this standard regimen, we’ve now learned at least three things:
.
1. Business plans rarely survive first contact with customers. As the boxer Mike Tyson once said about his opponents’ prefight strategies: “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.”
.
 2. No one besides venture capitalists and the late Soviet Union requires five-year plans to forecast complete unknowns. These plans are generally fiction, and dreaming them up is almost always a waste of time.
.
3. Start-ups are not smaller versions of large companies. They do not unfold in accordance with master plans. The ones that ultimately succeed go quickly from failure to failure, all the while adapting, iterating on, and improving their initial ideas as they continually learn from customers.
.
One of the critical differences is that while existing companies execute a business model, start-ups look for one. This distinction is at the heart of the lean start-up approach. It shapes the lean definition of a start-up: a temporary organization designed to search for a repeatable and scalable business model."
Esta abordagem tem a vantagem de não exigir muito dinheiro à partida. O modelo clássico leva a que o empreender atire o dinheiro todo de uma vez para cima da sua intuição sobre o que vai resultar. Quando afinal descobre que errou o tiro e que o alvo está mais ao lado... já não há capital para corrigir o tiro.
A abordagem lean-startup propõe que se gaste o mínimo enquanto não se tiver a certeza que se descobriu o que o mercado realmente pretende.
.
Continua.

1 comentário:

CCz disse...

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-25/real-entrepreneurs-dont-write-business-plans#r=hpt-ls