E quem não perceber isto...

As re-estruturações tornam as empresas mais pequenas, a re-engenharia torna as empresas mais rápidas e melhores. No entanto, isso pode ser irrelevante para o futuro de uma organização.

.

Hamel e Prahalad no livro "Competing for the Future" expõem o problema de forma superior.

.

“Our point is simple: It is not enough for a company to get smaller and better and faster, as important as these tasks may be; a company must also be capable of fundamentally reconceiving itself, of regenerating its core strategies, and of reinventing its industry (Moi ici: Smaller e Better actuam sobre o denominador da equação da produtividade, como escreve Larreche, actuam sobre a captura e a extracção de valor. Só sendo diferente é que se actua no numerador, na originação do valor, no ponto onde não há limites). In short, a company must also be capable of getting different (see Figure).
Just as some companies have gotten smaller faster than they've gotten better, others have gotten better without becoming much different.
…
A company surrenders today's businesses when it gets smaller faster than it gets better. A company surrenders tomorrow's businesses when it gets better without getting different. (Moi ici: Please rewind e reler e reler este parágrafo)

.

It is entirely possible for a company to downsize and reengineer without ever confronting the need to regenerate its core strategy, without ever being forced to rethink the boundaries of its industry, without ever having to imagine what customers might want in ten years' time, and without ever having to fundamentally redefine its "served market." Yet without such a fundamental reassessment, a company will be overtaken on the road to the future. Defending today's leadership is no substitute for creating tomorrow's leadership.”

.

E quem não perceber isto... defende a agricultura do passado, tenta adiar o reckoning day das empresas que perderam o comboio, ...
"