
Roger Martin critica a recomendação genérica de "Listen to the Scientists". A sua tese não é que o conhecimento científico seja inútil, mas que a ciência não produz verdades definitivas, nem que o título de especialista torne alguém infalível, desinteressado ou competente fora do seu domínio.
O autor utiliza a gestão da pandemia como exemplo, para atacar três mensagens:
1) Science is Truth
- You know, science is truth - Chief Medical Advisor to President Biden, Scientist Dr. Anthony Fauci
- We won't be free of this pandemic until we listen to the acknowledged truth - Former Politician Al Gore
- By not hearing the truth...they are prolonging how bad the economy will be - Politician Chuck Schumer
- Science is truth - CNN's Don Lemon (later fired)
2) Listen to the Scientists
- Science, science, science. Only listen to the scientists - Politician Nancy Pelosi
- Every scientist, every expert. Listen to the experts - Politician Kamala Harris
- Let's listen to the scientists - CNN's Chris Cuomo (later fired)
- We are seeing how important it is to follow the science - CNN's Anderson Cooper
- Seek out the scientists and follow their advice - MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace
3) Don't Think
- Now is the time to do what you are told - Scientist Fauci
- Trust that vaccine - DHS Scientist Dr. Rick Wright
- We are going to trust the science. We are going to trust the experts - Politician Justin Trudeau
- "Do your own research." It sounds so innocent, but it can have serious consequences - CNN's Brian Stelzer
- Trust science - Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla
"The message is don’t think about it, simply trust the scientific experts and do what you are told. Thinking could have “serious consequences.” Roll that around in your head: don’t think because it could be dangerous!"
Martin sustenta que especialistas, autoridades e empresas farmacêuticas podem exagerar a certeza do seu conhecimento, defender interesses próprios e desencorajar perguntas legítimas.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário