Profiting from Imperfections

"Profiting from Imperfections 

Perfect, profitless competition in Knight's theory requires perfect foresight - and thus the absence of uncertainty. But foresight alone cannot ensure perfectly competitive markets. Monopolization obviously suppresses competition. So does collusion.

...

In the 1950s, Mason's colleague, Joe Bain, published empirical research suggesting that (1) concentrated industry structures (i.e., where the leading firms had high market shares) produced significantly higher profits, and (2) firms in industries with high barriers to entry (from patents, product differentiation, and economies of scale) could charge high prices.

...

In perfectly competitive—and profitless—markets, all resources are put to their most valued use, and customers’ wants are satisfied to the greatest possible extent. “All that is is for the best,” as Voltaire’s Dr. Pangloss might say. In IO’s imperfectly competitive markets, businesses with pricing power deliberately and wastefully underproduce. They maximize profits by charging more and selling less than they would under perfect no-profit / no-loss competition."

E recordo "Um adepto e promotor incondicional da concorrência imperfeita."

O texto de Bhidé fornece a base teórica que justifica a intervenção estratégica que o blogue defende. Se os mercados perfeitos são estéreis do ponto de vista do lucro e da inovação, então os lucros empresariais e o desenvolvimento económico vêm da capacidade de agir em contextos imperfeitos e incertos. A especialização inteligente é precisamente isso: uma estratégia de explorar imperfeições produtivas e cognitivas para transformar economias — algo que tanto Bhidé como os promotores da política industrial inteligente parecem considerar essencial.

Trechos retirados de "Uncertainty and Enterprise de Amar Bhidé.