.
Acho sempre interessante arranjar exemplos concretos, com nomes e tudo, que ajudam a suportar a tese do Evangelho do Valor:
"Turns out low price software is easy to buy — and easy to leave. Our churn was pretty bad. When the customer isn’t invested in the product financially, they’re not invested mentally, either. This one thing doesn’t work the way I would like… I’ll just take my business elsewhere.
.
Pursuing the lowest price point for your product is a race to the bottom. It also cripples your ability to grow:
.
"Making real money as a business changes a lot of things. More revenue allows you to build a real business where you have the resources to invest in things like better support and new features." (Moi ici: Desencadeia-se uma reacção auto-catalítica, desde que se continue atento ao que é valor para os clientes e outros elementos do ecossistema da procura)
.
Our total number of customers immediately began falling; fewer people signed up while our churn rate remained the same. In spite of that, our revenue went up — significantly so for the first time in a year.
.
Let me restate that: with the same amount of churn and fewer signups, we made more money. Most surprisingly: in the first month of our new pricing plans, we receive more signups at our top price point than we did at the lowest."
.
A matemática é potente:
"Just one of those higher-price customers is the equivalent of 25 previous customers — and it takes us much less effort to make one customer happy, versus twenty five. Will we grow more slowly? Yes. Will our growth be more stable? Absolutely."
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário