A crise já vai acabar?

Como é que ela começou?
.
"The complex issue being buried by this latest analogy is “what caused the crisis in the first place?” The answer, as I’ve been arguing for years now, is that a debt-financed speculative bubble generated illusory wealth as it grew, but its collapse has now left us with a mountain of private sector debt.
.
Now that the Ponzi folly of leveraged speculation on asset prices is over, debt has stopped growing and the contribution that growing debt made to demand has disappeared. That alone is enough to cause a crisis: in the USA in 2006-07, private debt grew by $4 trillion, boosting aggregate demand in that $14 trillion economy by over 20 per cent.
.
Even stabilising debt at its current level results in demand falling by 23 per cent in America. And now the debt bubble is acting in reverse – reducing demand as firms and families reduce debt, and necessarily spend less in the process.
.
The result is a plunge in demand that drives unemployment up and production down. Government attempts to stop this by throwing large amounts of public money at it can attenuate the process, but they are too small to counteract it because the debt levels are so huge."
.
Como é que era a pergunta? Ah, sim: Como é que a crise começou?
.
Trecho daqui.
.
Recomendo a observação dos gráficos de Edward Hugh sobre as compras no retalho na Alemanha, Itália e França.
.
E por causa da evolução etária europeia também não fica mal esta leitura:
.
"The continuing collapse in world trade is due entirely to a drop in US consumption rates. There are many articles this week about how US savings has soared from 0% to almost 3%. Of course, the government mailed all us oldsters free money last month! So we all stick this in our savings accounts. The other end of the spectrum, bankruptcies, has cleaned out the ‘lending’ side of the ledger, too. One thing about us old coots: we are not tempted by commercials to buy stupid stuff like we were when we were young and fell for nearly every temptation that passed under our noses.
.
So, getting an oldster to buy stuff is much harder. So any windfall we get, we tend to put aside for a while and take our time, figuring out what to do next. So any boost to our bottom lines will sit there for a while. Whereas, young people have pressing needs. For example, when I was younger, I was making a family and needing nearly everything. Aside from the art of dumpster diving, I had to buy all sorts of domestic stuff. Then, there was the needs of the string of children. More spending.
.
Now, I don’t need furniture. Or much of any stuff. I have other needs, of course. But I can take my time unlike when one has a growing child and like my son, for example, whose feet would grow an inch a month, it seemed, I can buy shoes and wear them for several years. Children change size and shape nearly nonstop. So you can’t just buy something and use it for 5 years.
.
Japan is one example of a country that is like the elderly population here: the entire country is now in the ‘no need to buy’ mode more and more due to the baby dearth there. And the depression which was fake for 5 years as the export sector became one of the biggest profit powers on earth, is now back to a real depression. And nothing is more depressing, psychologically, than a country that has fewer and fewer youths."