Ainda acerca da Quirky

Ainda não tinha dez anos já esta imagem fazia parte do meu mundo:

Quando olhamos para trás e pensamos no Homo Erectus ou na mais antiga Lucy, podemos perceber que continuam connosco, algures cá dentro dos nossos genes, e que tiveram o seu papel para chegarmos até aqui. Algures na linha do tempo foram essenciais e foram as respostas mais adequadas a um dado contexto do ambiente em redor. Porque mudaram e o mundo mudou, o nível do jogo subiu e foram precisos jogadores com outras capacidades.
.
Ao ver as notícias sobre o falhanço da Quirky não consigo deixar de pensar que foi uma primeira tentativa, uma primeira abordagem a este promissor futuro da democratização da inovação e produção. Outras experiências virão e sobre os ombros do que a Quirky conseguiu desenvolverão ainda mais o conceito. Acho que já é a segunda vez esta semana que recordo Popper em sintonia com este tema.
.
Em "The Real Reason Quirky Failed" encontro uma reflexão interessante sobre elementos que possam ter contribuído para este desfecho:

"building 50+ hardware products a year as a startup is the modern-day version of gluing feathers to your arms and flying.
...
Quirky didn’t want to build one or two products a year (like most normal product companies), it set its sights on 20, 30, then 50+ products a year. The entire Quirky organism was designed for speed: ingesting thousands of ideas, selecting the best ones with a high-speed voting system, crafting beautiful marketing, and customizing end-caps at major retailers. But that’s where it stopped.
.
A good company builds one product, learns from its customers, and iterates to make that product exceptional. Each step in the process is designed to refine a product and find the often elusive “product/market fit” that is the basis for all successful startups.
...
Quirky never iterated on its products.
...
Quirky systematically broke the cardinal rule of startups: iterate rapidly to build a product people love.
...
Lack of product focus had a nasty side-effect. When you look across the Quirky product line, you’re left with one fundamental feeling: confusion. 

Customers are left asking “what does Quirky stand for as a company?”
...
The Quirky brand can’t be everything to all people but it was trying to.
.
Quirky was competing on all levels with all brands in every product category. This is a losing strategy for any startup."

E este trecho que se segue... devia ser motivo de reflexão para tantos que não ousam por falta de financiamento:

"Hindsight is always 20/20. I’m sure a lot of decisions within the company would be made differently today than in 2009 when the company was founded. If Quirky raised a little less money, hired a few less people, and focused on building just a few products that people loved, I bet the path of Quirky would look very different today. Part of the culprit is the venture capital model, which optimizes for growth over all else. But companies shouldn’t forget that building a product that people love is the oxygen that enables everything else to exist." 

Curiosidade do dia

A propósito deste desfecho "Quirky, an Invention Start-Up, Files for Bankruptcy".
.
Pena não ter resultado. Foi mais uma espécie a tentar adaptar-se a uma oportunidade de nicho que surgiu no campo de possibilidades da tecnologia conjugada com os modelos de negócio.
.
Outras espécies se seguirão, algumas aproveitarão partes desse ADN e construirão algo diferente, uma nova tentativa de resposta... como não recordar Popper "Reduzir a taxa de insucesso das startups (parte III)"

Mais umas pinceladas sobre Mongo

"How Open Source Hardware Is Driving the 3D-Printing Industry":
.
"Making it easier, faster and cheaper to produce physical objects could fundamentally shift the manufacturing paradigm. As 3D printing, powered by Arduino and other open source technologies, becomes more prevalent, economies of scale become much less of a problem. A 3D printer can print a few devices - or thousands - without significant retooling, pushing upfront costs to near-zero.
.
This is what The Economist calls the “Third Industrial Revolution,” where devices and things can be made in smaller, cleaner factories with far less overhead and - significantly - less labor."

...

“Offshore production is increasingly moving back to rich countries not because Chinese wages are rising, but because companies now want to be closer to their customers so that they can respond more quickly to changes in demand.”
.
"Manufacturer Quirky finds China not always cheapest":
.
"Kaufman has been contracting with Chinese factories since 2005, when he started his first company making iPod accessories. Back then, Chinese manufacturers "fought hard" for his business, but they have since grown "cocky," he says."

.

"Google: Android fragmentation ‘up to manufacturers’: