O “Mendelian executive” - a variação, ou será variedade? (parte II)

Parte I.

E volto ao executivo Mendeliano.

"With regard to processes of variation, on occasion, our Mendelian executive will have ideas. These ideas may stem from personal aha moments, observations of others, and recommendations—high-priced or unsolicited—of others. Vacuums are generally not fertile settings for interesting insights. Thus, individual differences in strategy “variants” may reflect the distinctive prior and current contexts to which executives have been exposed. [Moi ici: Costumo dizer que não se formula uma estratégia a partir de uma folha em branco. Uma estratégia depende da experiência passada, uma estratégia é uma função do ADN] This may be exposure to particular sets of actual or potential customers, thought leaders from diverse fields, prior related businesses, and so on. As network theorists highlight, these links need not be based on one’s direct experience but may be indirect experiences mediated by other individuals with whom one is connected. [Moi ici: Aprendemos com o que reflectimos, com o que vemos/lemos e com o que experientamos. Recordar "Subir na escala da abstracção"]
...
To an important degree, variants are a by-product of ongoing efforts to address issues of existing customers and solving associated technical and nontechnical challenges. [Moi ici: As variantes aparecem motivadas pela experiencia de viver o dia-a-dia e a vontade de resolver problemas que surgem] However, per the self-conscious guidance of such dynamics of our Mendelian executive, the identification of potential new domains for existing lines of development is not a matter of chance or happenstance. Schumpeter (1934) characterizes entrepreneurial action as creative recombination of products, technologies, and markets. The fact that these are “recombinations” is indicative that these entrepreneurial actions entail the movement into adjacent spaces—the market opportunities that might be pursued given the firm’s existing set of capabilities, its market position, and the competitive and market context that it faces. In considering such recombinations from the perspective of a Mendelian executive, it is important to recognize the intentionality underlying such efforts. There is a lookahead to alternative strategic opportunities. [Moi ici: Acredito que a diferença no desempenho das organizações dentro de um mesmo sector económico resulta da maior ou menor intencionalidade, da maior ou menor predisposição para testar alternativas ao status-quo, a par da qualidade intrinseca dessas alternativas]
...
Experimentation, however, does not obviate the need for ex ante choices—a consideration that the literature tends to neglect. Not all candidate experiments can be carried out. The lean start-up approach takes an extreme view on this and postulates that only one experimental trial should be carried out at any moment. Real options approaches encourage a plurality of efforts and the subsequent culling of this potentially large set. However, options are not costless, and a firm will need to restrict itself up front to some modest set of possibilities. Thus, while the analytical distinction between ex ante cognitive bases of evaluation and ex post experimental approaches is quite important, even ex post experimental approaches require some degree of upfront assessment of appropriate initiatives."

O executivo Mendeliano não é um tipo acéfalo que anda aqui por ver andar os outros, procura não ser mais uma bóia, como referia Ortega y Gasset, procura não ser mais uma folha na corrente levada pelas circunstâncias, mas procura fazer a diferença.

Trechos retirados de "Mendel in the C-Suite: Design and the Evolution of Strategies" de Daniel A. Levinthal e publicado em 2017 por Strategy Science 2(4):282-287.