quarta-feira, maio 10, 2017

"driver of productivity differences" (parte II)

Parte I.

Há tempos ao pesquisar algo aqui no blogue cheguei a este postal "estado, estado, estado,...".

A matéria desse postal é reduzida a quase nada quando se pega num país, quando se escolhe um mesmo sector da economia, CAE, e se aprecia o panorama de variabilidade no desempenho das empresas, apesar do Estado, das leis, dos trabalhadores, serem os mesmos.

Aqui no blogue gosto de chamar a atenção para a importância da idiossincrasia no desempenho das empresas:

Por isso, recomendo a leitura de "Good Managers, Not Machines, Drive Productivity Growth":
"When people discuss what drives long-run productivity, they usually focus on technical change. But productivity is about more than robots, new drugs and self-driving vehicles.
...
a huge number of statistical analyses and case studies of the impact of new technologies on firm performance have shown that there is a massive variation in its impact. What’s much more important than the amount spent on fancy tech is the way managerial practices are used in the firms that implement the changes.
...
look at the management scores across countries. They are highly correlated with GDP per capita. In fact, almost a third of the cross-country gaps in productivity are explained by management practices.
...
the economic environment is not destiny. Organizations can heal themselves. Firms need to be honest with themselves – many simply do not realize that there is much room for improvement. They need to benchmark themselves rigorously and seek out ways to change, even if this involves external advice."
 Qual é a mensagem do mainstream dos governos, dos políticos, dos media, das associações patronais?

Coitadinhos dos empresários, têm de ser ajudados, têm de ser apoiados, ... olha aqui está o Vosso Salvador: o governo de turno!

A propósito daquele "They need to benchmark themselves rigorously" recordar "Satisficing"

Sem comentários: