Pensamento estratégico para crescer e para cortar

"According to a recent McKinsey Quarterly survey, 79 percent of all companies have cut costs in response to the global economic crisis—but only 53 percent of executives think that doing so has helped their companies weather it. Yet organizations continue to cut. Cost reductions often go wrong, we believe, and our experience suggests that they can be done in a better way." (Moi ici: Para começar, don't get me wrong, se acredito, como acredito, que estamos a viver uma verdadeira recalibração, e que na maioria dos sectores não se voltará tão cedo ao mesmo nível de consumo que existia, antes do fim do deboche consumista internacional que acabou em 2007, há que fazer algo, por que com a redução do consumo vem a redução na venda de unidades, e com a deflação vem a redução na facturação por unidade vendida. Assim, se se reduzem as entradas de dinheiro e se o fenómeno vai durar, há que ser realista e reduzir as saídas de dinheiro. Logo, há que reduzir custos. Mas que custos?)

.

"Here’s an example of how things can go wrong. An international energy company that needed to save money fast started by simply defining the amount of savings it needed and then required each department to cut costs by a similar amount, primarily through head count reductions, which varied from 17 to 22 percent. The reality, however, was that the company needed to invest more in certain technological areas that were changing quickly, as well as in operations, where performance was far below industry benchmarks. What’s more, the HR and IT departments substantially duplicated certain activities because different layers in the organization were doing similar things. Much deeper cuts could therefore be made in these functions, with little strategic risk. But the company cut costs across the board, and just six months later, technology and operations were lobbying hard to bring in new staff to take on an “uncontrollable workload,” while substantial duplication remained in HR and IT." (Moi ici: o corte nos custos realizado sem pensamento estratégico, procurando ser justo e equitativo. Pero todavia, já deviamos ter aprendido com o Rei Lear que a vida não é justa nem injusta, a vida é a vida. Cortar nos custos não pode ser guiado pela justiça! Uau, como esta última frase pode ser mal interpretada!!! Cortar nos custos tem de ser uma questão de estratégia!)

.

"We suggest a better way: companies should start any cost-cutting initiative by thinking through whether they could restructure the business to take advantage of current and projected marketplace trends (for instance, by exiting relatively low-profit or low-growth businesses) or to mitigate threats, such as consolidating competitors. An important part of the analysis is to understand a company’s financial situation and the range of potential outcomes under a number of different external economic scenarios. Second, within the resulting strategy, take time to understand which activities drive value—in the public and nonprofit sectors, a good proxy might be mandated outcomes, such as the number of workers, health metrics, or school performance—and which activities do or could make the organization competitively distinctive. Organizations should invest in value-creating activities and cut costs in others while meeting clear financial goals in a set time frame." (Moi ici: This is the answer, estratégia de criação de valor, realizar os cortes nos custos orientado pela estratégia de criação de valor. Quais são as áreas onde podemos e queremos fazer a diferença? Nessas temos de continuar a investir, parar é definhar e iniciar o processo de corrosão da imagem da empresa na mente dos clientes-alvo. Nas outras áreas, naqueles processos que não são críticos para a execução estratégica, aí sim, realizar os cortes nos custos. Exactamente, estava em Vouzela quando, há anos, escrevi este texto no carro sobre os processos críticos e os de contexto (parte I, parte II e parte III)

.

Trecho retirado de "A better way to cut costs".

.