"In October 1964, the Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev was deposed in a nonviolent coup. Adam Ulam, an expert on the Soviet Union at Harvard, was asked why he had failed to predict the event. "If it came as a surprise to Khrushchev," Ulam replied, "why wouldn't it have come as a surprise to me?"It is a good question. Given the future's opacity, why should we expect self-appointed futurists-all those jetsetting consultants, risk analysts and TED Talk presenters with their trend lines and game plans-to know any more about what's going to happen than the rest of us? According to Nick Foster, a designer and writer based in Oakland, Calif., we shouldn't."
Talvez o melhor seja recordar "Subsídios para um primeiro-ministro" e as cinco maneiras de encarar o futuro.
Tento seguir: Não é o que nos acontece que conta. É o que fazemos com o que nos acontece.
Trecho inicial retirado do WSJ de hoje, um comentário a um livro, "Could Should Might Don't: How We Think About the Future"
%2014.15.jpeg)

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário