"It's your job to define the "offer" for your customers. It's their job to accept or decline."

 

"In one case, Philippi and his team were working with a manufacturer of optical instruments. The company had about 3,500 customers, mostly military, aerospace, and health care organizations. Some number crunching revealed that 10% of those customers yielded 80% of the revenue.

When it came to profit, though, the numbers were even more stark. The company's top set of customers were generating more than all of the company's profit.! In other words, the great majority of the company's customers were unprofitable.

"The fallacy that most people believe is that 20% of customers or products are 80% of the profits," said Philippi. "And that's not true. What we find is that those 20% of customers— that are 80% of the revenue-are generally 150% of the profit. So what we tell our clients from the get-go is: Your problem isn't that you're not making enough. It's that you're not keeping it." Philippi has found that his clients make twin mistakes: They undercoddle their best customers and overcoddle their worst. Often those mistakes derive from a noble desire: These companies aspire to treat customers the same. And treating people equally is a great goal for, say, craps dealers. Or democracy. But to treat a $1 million customer the same as a $100 customer? It's like treating your hamster the same as your daughter because they're both mammals.

Philippi finds that, paradoxically, the biggest customers are often treated worse than the smallest. "One of the questions we ask clients is: What's your on-time delivery rate for those critical few customers—the 20% that are 80% of the revenue?" he said. "And it was shocking to me, but what we generally find is that the on-time delivery rates are far better with the smaller customers than they are with their largest customers."

The reason? Their orders are simpler. It's easier to get 1 piece shipped out than a complicated assembly involving 100 pieces. But if the shipping team is measured on the percentage of on-time deliveries, then that provides a perverse incentive to neglect the hard cases. They can ace the 97 easy deliveries, deprioritize the 3 hard ones, and look like geniuses (97% on-time rate!). Once you catch on to this pattern, you can easily fix it. You make sure that all shipments are not treated equally. For your top customers, the on-time rate should be perfect: 100%. Always and forever. That's how you keep them loyal and encourage them to do more business with you.

Meanwhile, what should you do about the mass of overcoddled customers? Philippi says that clients are often fearful about changing those relationships. Aren't we going to ruin our business if we tell some customers "no",!!

He reassures them that it's not about telling some customers to buzz oft. The point is to ensure that customers are paying for the resources they're consuming. There are many ways to approach this: Raise prices. Create a minimum order size. Set lower expectations for things like delivery time. Offer self-service tools.

It's your job to define the "offer" for your customers. It's their job to accept or decline. If there are customers who huff and puff about your new offer and take their business elsewhere, take heart: You've won a double victory. You've taken some unprofitable customers off your ledger and added them to your competitor's."

Recordar a curva de Stobachoff. 

Trechos retirados de "Reset: How to Change What's Not Working" de Dan Heath