"a strategy is the exercise of power"

O capítulo 6 de "The Crux - How Leaders Become Strategists" de Richard P. Rumelt chama-se "The Challenge of Power" e dá que pensar. Começa assim:

"Attacking the crux of a problem or challenge requires action. And that means making some activities, people, and departments more important than others. These shifts in roles, influence, and resources are the concomitant of focus, making some objectively more important than others. There is no escaping that strategy is an exercise in power.

...

A strategy is a design and direction imposed by leadership on an organization. Strategy began when people realized that telling warriors to ‘go out and fight the invaders’ didn’t work. Leaders had to impose a structure, a design, on how the group would fight. In a modern business, a strategy is the exercise of power to make parts of the system do things they would not do, if left to themselves.”

...

Despite the view that things "just evolve," strategy is an exercise in power. In a typical organization, if senior executives don't pay attention to anything strategic, most things will go on pretty much as before, at least for a while. People will continue to sell, factories will produce, software engineers will continue to improve code, and so on. Department heads will sign contracts. and accounting reports will be generated and audited. What will almost never happen is something important that is nonroutine, something new and different. It won't happen because important changes always mean shifts in power and resources. Strategy means asking, or making, people do things that break with routine and focus collective effort and resources on new, or nonroutine, purposes."

Vamos repetir o último sublinhado, "Strategy means asking, or making, people do things that break with routine and focus collective effort and resources on new, or nonroutine, purposes" ... Há uma citação atribuída a vários autores que diz qualquer coisa como:

"O que nos trouxe o sucesso no passado, não pode ser base para o sucesso futuro"

Isto implica algures ter de fazer um corte epistemológico. Um corte doloroso, quase como matar um filho... o que o peditório das amélias tenta fazer é evitar este corte. E sem fazer este corte não há subida na escala de valor, apenas migalhas de melhoria da eficiência, traduzidas em incrementos de caca na produtividade.

Uso a figura dos vikings porque Rumelt conta que quando avançou com esta explicação do que é estratégia, numa universidade sueca, os investigadores ficaram horrorizados. Segundo Rumelt, os descendentes dos vikings achavam que estratégia era o resultado da evolução natural, o simples deixar actuar da realidade.

Trechos retirados de "The Crux - How Leaders Become Strategists" de Richard P. Rumelt.