Agarrem-me senão eu mato-me!!! (parte VI)

Continuado da parte I, parte II, parte III, parte IV e parte V.
.
Mais um conjunto de conselhos para as "grandes marcas" que compõem a Centromarca. Estes conselhos foram retirados do livro "How to succeed at retail: winning case studies and strategies for retailers and brands" de Keith Lincoln e Lars Thomassen.
.
"Retailers are fantastic at selling things, but very few retailers are very good at developing things. That used to be the raison d’être of the brands. But with their obsession for volume they have often mixed up genuine innovations with the next flavour-extension or volume-variant package. Many FMCG companies have forgotten what originally made them big. When it comes to the retail arena, shoppers reach out for products, but they are often disappointed. Lots of companies have a brand these days, but few have a product. Or as Sir Martin Sorrel puts it: ‘We have become so obsessed with the sizzle that we have forgotten the steak’. The brand is never the solution. The product is. In their book Blue Ocean Strategy, authors W Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne researched the effect of creating groundbreaking, creative new products, rather than variations of already existing products. Their conclusion was that 86 per cent of new product launches were variants of existing products and accounted for 39 per cent of total profit. The remaining 14 per cent of new products were real new products and accounted for a massive 61 per cent of total profit. Real products mean real profit. (Moi ici: Gente com o locus de controlo no interior, em vez de procurar culpados no exterior, volta para o estirador e aguça o ouvido, em busca de algo que faça a diferença)
…
The only way you can truly make your brand consistently innovative is to offer far more for more. When you look at your own products innovations, do you really meet this objective?
Or are you just producing line extensions and calling them innovations?
As the head of a major Scandinavian retailer recently said to us: ‘I’m sick of brands coming here and saying they’ve been in the business for a hundred years and know everything there is to know. Here’s our new line extension flavour variant. Give us more shelf space. I don’t want this. I want innovation.
I want food iPods.’
Yes, product development is difficult, but it is one of the most important ways for a brand to keep its position at retail level, and one of the only really consistent ways to avoid private label competition. Food brands in particular should be embracing the leading trends like health, food labelling and the environment and using them to distance themselves from the retailer brands. ...The future belongs to retailers and brands that proactively create wants – retailers and brands that are transforming boring consumption situations into highly motivating shopping experiences.
Shopping for your brand is as important as your brand. There is no doubt that brands need retailers and that retailers need brands, but retailers only need strong brands (as brands need strong retailers) – brands that understand the new retail world; brands that understand that the product is key; that they have to build their brands, not only from mass media, but also from the shelf. Innovation is and always has been the key.
You need to make this innovation work for you as a cooperative tool with retailers.
…
The shelf is at the beginning of everything and every single shelf represents an arena that has a unique set of opportunities and challenges that define our strategic perspectives and resulting actions.
Understanding our shelf – key points to be addressed
• Define your shelves – your arenas.
• Define the way those shelves are structured.
• Define the main shelf challenges you face.
• Identify the means to meet those challenges.
• Evaluate and optimize your selection of the shelves you want to be on.
• Decide whether you’re fighting on the right shelves today.
• Start exploring alternative shelf opportunities, from the internet to concept stores.
• Consider creating your own unique shelves.
• Consider reinventing the shelves you’re already on.
• Consider if there are any possibilities for co-opetition that will maximize shelf opportunities."
.
O leitor José Silva escreveu-me ontem defendendo que o próprio distribuidor pode vir a ter os dias contados com o advento da internet.
.
"Você já reparou quão eficiente é o modelo em que há uma grande superfície entre o produtor e o consumidor?

Há custos com a logistica, com a marca, com os funcionários, custos de deslocação do cliente à grande superficie. Tudo isto para se apresentar os produtos nas prateleiras para os consumidores poderem escolher, pagar e levar para as prateleiras lá de casa.

Tudo parece obvio até 1995. Com a Internet não devia haver necessidade de um intermediário entre o produtor e consumidor. Não é dificil conceptualizar um mundo onde não existem retalhistas e em que cada produtor distribui os seus produtos em casa dos seus clientes com maior benefício para ambos.

Tudo isto para dizer o quê ? Não acredito que o poder dos retalhistas dure muitos mais anos."
.
Não há rendas vitalícias, nem para as marcas, nem para a distribuição. Quem melhor perceber e servir as necessidades e expectativas do consumidor do futuro terá o seu benefício... sempre à condição. Não adianta é fazer o choradinho! O equilíbrio pontuado da parte V pode servir para suportar que actualmente já estão a fermentar as forças que mudarão o panorama.