Eu sei que é uma curiosidade de há quase 20 dias, mas tem ficado a remoer na minha mente.
""I am increasingly convinced of something that we might call the Carter Rule: rich democracies need a crisis in order to change. It is almost impossible to sell voters on drastic reforms until their nation is in acute trouble."[Moi ici: A dificuldade de implementar reformas antes de uma crise]...There are no votes in preventive action. Few of us mean it when we urge governments to think long-term, to fix roofs while the sun is shining, and so on. [Moi ici: O custo político das reformas antes de uma crise ser óbvia. Os líderes que tentam reformar precocemente enfrentam oposição pública porque os custos são evidentes, mas os benefícios só aparecem a longo prazo]...If crisis isn't quite a sufficient condition for change, I suggest it has become a necessary one. This is even truer of high-income countries, where enough voters have enough to lose that even small tweaks to the status quo are provocative. [Moi ici: Mudanças radicais muitas vezes precisam de um colapso completo do status quo para serem aceites pelos eleitores]..."Britain now, like America in his time, is still a few years away from that moment in the life of nations when voters look around and say, at last, 'Enough.""
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário