.
A verdade é que os inquéritos de satisfação dos clientes são pouco respeitados pelos cliente e, também por isso, poucos resultados palpáveis geram.
.
A lógica que vi por trás do "how are you doing" está muito relacionada com a separação crescente entre aquilo que é possível pôr num contrato, as especificações, e aquilo que o cliente realmente quer, resultados.
.
Entretanto, encontrei neste texto "5 Keys to Customer Experience for the Future" uma defesa do "how are you doing" muito mais interessante e atraente:
"Which of these two questions is outside-in: (1) "How likely are you to [do X for or think Y about] our company?" versus (2) "How well have we helped you meet your goals?" The latter is about us helping the customer, while the first question is about the customer helping us. Think about which of those two questions is most appealing to customers. If we give anyone the opportunity to talk about themselves we'll get a lot more participation and a lot more valuable information.Como ninguém fala sobre isto...e como o Guia Interpretativo da APCER faz esta comparação:
.
Why it's key to future success: Expecting customers to do something for the company is perhaps a bit odd. They've already paid fair market value for what they bought. If they're participating in a survey or in social media or anything else we can be grateful for that generosity. Otherwise, as much as we're reaching out, it's actually from an inside-out, self-serving perspective. We should seek to extend value or create value to continue a fair dynamic in our hopes for customers to engage with us.
.
Focusing on the customers' goals can make a huge difference in what we can achieve through CXM."
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário