quinta-feira, maio 16, 2013

"future-back" approach to strategy"

Começar pelo fim é uma receita que sigo há muito tempo

Gosto de usar a metáfora da corda ninja, para a lançar até ao futuro desejado para "Fazer uma excursão até ao Futuro Imaginado" e, depois, usá-la para voltar ao presente e mudar a realidade actual para a converter na realidade do futuro desejado. É a grande diferença entre empurrar para a frente, para o desconhecido, para um futuro e, puxar a partir do futuro desejado. Podemos estar no presente fisicamente e ser puxados por nós próprios no futuro desejado... recordar Ortega y Gasset.
.
Por isso, gostei desta reflexão:
"Organizations should have their moonshots. They're a keystone of what we call a "future-back" approach to strategy, which unlike the "present forward" nature of most strategic-planning processes, doesn't operate under the assumption that tomorrow will be pretty much like today, and the day after pretty much more of the same. In stable times, present-forward approaches help optimize resource allocation. But in turbulent times, these approaches can lead companies to miss critical market inflection points.
.
At the heart of the future-back process is a consensus view of your company's desired future state.This isn't scenario planning, where you consider a range of possibilities. This is putting a stake in the ground — specifying what you want your core business to look like, what adjacent markets you want to edge into, and the moonshots you'll try for.
...
A good moonshot has three ingredients. First, it inspires.
...
Second, it is credible.
...
Finally, it is imaginative. It isn't an obvious extrapolation of what's happening today ... but something that offers a meaningful break from the past.

Trechos retirados de "What a Good Moonshot Is Really For"

Sem comentários: